Live data from Hacker News

Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?

nature.com

131–140 of 280 posts

Re: Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?

#131
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Getting an air quality monitor was enlightening and terrifying. My child’s room (which unfortunately doesn’t have great ventilation) would sometimes hit 4000 ppb VOCs, which I tracked down to some of her stuffed animals…

Still not sure how post-Covid, we haven't concluded that improving indoor ventilation should be a massive public health priority.

Seems like there'd be a lot of tension between that goal, and reducing energy use.

Re: Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?

#132
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Collecting such individual data via blood & urine samples (possibly fat biopsies & breast milk as well) on a yearly basis should really be part of a standard medical checkup procedure No so long as sickness is so profitable. The incentives aren't there like you would think.

What about in every western country where it isn't profitable?

[deleted]

Re: Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?

#133
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Collecting such individual data via blood & urine samples (possibly fat biopsies & breast milk as well) on a yearly basis should really be part of a standard medical checkup procedure No so long as sickness is so profitable. The incentives aren't there like you would think.

What about in every western country where it isn't profitable?

[deleted]

Re: Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even Nature stated microplastics are everywhere, yet we do not know what effects it will have. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01143-3

What do you mean, "even Nature"? They have no incentive to downplay the omnipresence of microplastics

I understand it as "not only alarmist sources but also a reputable journal".

Re: Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?

#135

> "However, the effects of individual exposures remain largely unknown. To study early-life exposures and their implications for multiple cancer types will require prospective cohort studies with dedicated biobanking and data collection technologies." What that means is analytical body-burden data collection should be a medical norm, for a variety of substances: polychlorinated biphenyls, triazine herbicides (atrazin…

> Collecting such individual data via blood & urine samples (possibly fat biopsies & breast milk as well) on a yearly basis should really be part of a standard medical checkup procedure No so long as sickness is so profitable. The incentives aren't there like you would think.

It's not so much that sickness is profitable as the abject laziness and refusal to properly dispose of chemical byproducts in industry, as that costs money which hurts the bottom line. This is absolutely rampant worldwide and governments are corruptly influenced to look the other way to more or less degree depending on the country you are in.

Re: Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?

#136

I feel like there has been a great increase in mental health issues: anxiety, depression, etc., especially among youth. I don’t recall these being major issues from when I was a youth in the late 80s and early 90s. I’m told that I’m wrong and people just didn’t talk about it so I wasn’t aware of it. But even amongst close family members and friends it wasn’t a thing. Now, I’ve seen some claim it is the post 9/11 worl…

Perhaps knowing that we aren't going to do anything significant about the climate crisis, and thus devastate our environment and the carrying capacity of the planet, might be what's making them a bit touchy.

Re: Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Impossible. It is safe and effective.

It is telling that people are unwilling to even talk about that. Telling that people fall off science for their political ideologies.

It's telling that people can't help but bring up some very-recent thing they're upset about for dubious reasons, when commenting on an article discussing a trend going back decades. People are "unwilling", in this thread, because it's irrelevant.

Unless we're going for "all vaccines cause cancer", but from the context ("that vaccine", "It is safe and effective.") it seems we're talking about the Covid-19 vaccines. So, irrelevant. Whether they do or don't increase cancer risk (or even if they decrease it, which is also possible) has no bearing on the topic at hand.

Re: Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?

#138
Wouldn't it be awful if unbridled capitalism turns out to be mankind's Great Filter?

We'll be licky to become a Type I civilization after poisoning ourselves and the environment through exposure to chemicals and conditions we do not fully comprehend in return of some convenience, cheaper goods and making some a little richer.

Re: Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?

#139

I feel like there has been a great increase in mental health issues: anxiety, depression, etc., especially among youth. I don’t recall these being major issues from when I was a youth in the late 80s and early 90s. I’m told that I’m wrong and people just didn’t talk about it so I wasn’t aware of it. But even amongst close family members and friends it wasn’t a thing. Now, I’ve seen some claim it is the post 9/11 worl…

But I also think "back in the days" life was more fixed. Probably getting a full time job as employee, starting a family, getting a house was not really optional. Now there are much more choices. Add to that all the hyper-connectivity. I don't really think people were better off but were just forced to handle everything more calmly. Growing up in the 90s, what I've found is that things changed a lot when people were…

Not to mention living in America is like playing life on hard mode; at least relative to other OECD countries. There's a lot more things you have to take care of / think about in America. There's a level of mental overhead that does not exist in other developed countries that many Americans do not realize are optional. eg health insurance, education, unemployment safety net, or even little things like way too many coverage options when buying car insurance.

When you do not have to worry about your health or physical safety if you lose your job, you can chill out a little bit. You don't need to bend over backwards for your job, it is easier to enforce boundaries. This dynamic puts adult Americans under a lot of stress, and it manifests in many ways. And it propagates to the children too, through lack of attention or stressful home.

Re: Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic?

#140
Anecdotally, I've found out in recent year about many women having serious thyroid issues. I'm sure more people being open about their health increases this, but the sheer frequency seems absurd.

Whatever industrial chemicals we're ingesting need to be drastically controlled, and this poisoning needs to be branded so that the general population knows about it. I don't want years of my life to be an externality to a slightly cheaper industrial process.

Post reply on HN