21–30 of 109 posts
I managed under 1.5KB for a page that has an actual function, not just a test: http://www.captiveportal.co.uk And yes, that’s supposed to be a non-https link. I think the entire site, including favicon, might be under 5KB. You can check here: https://github.com/josharcheruk/CaptivePortal
I managed under 1.5KB for a page that has an actual function, not just a test: http://www.captiveportal.co.uk And yes, that’s supposed to be a non-https link. I think the entire site, including favicon, might be under 5KB. You can check here: https://github.com/josharcheruk/CaptivePortal
https://www.captiveportal.co.uk works and doesnt redirect to a non-https link, at this point its hard for normal users to go to an http:// link without their browser overriding them neverssl.com solves this by redirecting to a random subdomain (for some reason that isnt clear to me near midnight) a .co.uk equivalent is a great idea though, if it can be made accessible to users with hostile browsers
I managed under 1.5KB for a page that has an actual function, not just a test: http://www.captiveportal.co.uk And yes, that’s supposed to be a non-https link. I think the entire site, including favicon, might be under 5KB. You can check here: https://github.com/josharcheruk/CaptivePortal
Were you aware of http://neverssl.com before making this? Though I guess your page is slightly smaller (687 bytes vs 1900 bytes compressed). http://captive.apple.com is even smaller though.
I managed under 1.5KB for a page that has an actual function, not just a test: http://www.captiveportal.co.uk And yes, that’s supposed to be a non-https link. I think the entire site, including favicon, might be under 5KB. You can check here: https://github.com/josharcheruk/CaptivePortal
Well, the function is not in the content so your website could even be completely empty. I would say https://cv.tdarb.org/ has more function.
I managed under 1.5KB for a page that has an actual function, not just a test: http://www.captiveportal.co.uk And yes, that’s supposed to be a non-https link. I think the entire site, including favicon, might be under 5KB. You can check here: https://github.com/josharcheruk/CaptivePortal
https://www.captiveportal.co.uk works and doesnt redirect to a non-https link, at this point its hard for normal users to go to an http:// link without their browser overriding them neverssl.com solves this by redirecting to a random subdomain (for some reason that isnt clear to me near midnight) a .co.uk equivalent is a great idea though, if it can be made accessible to users with hostile browsers
Last website in the club closes my mobile chrome
I just recently stumbled upon a site that had it all: webp/avif everywhere, minified CSS, even ditching unused classes from used frameworks, CSS data:-embedded and subsetted fonts (I think it even used a recent version of FontAwesome 6, but it still managed to make the WOFF2 be only 2kB in size because they just utilized like two dozen logos), only one request each for CSS and JavaScript (everything concatenated and with nice cache policies) and the site was still usable/viewable even without either one of these if you wanted to. Everything was automated in their deployment pipeline even. It only came to my notice because they wrote an article about it. I can't find it in my history but those things will stick to your head for a while.
I managed under 1.5KB for a page that has an actual function, not just a test: http://www.captiveportal.co.uk And yes, that’s supposed to be a non-https link. I think the entire site, including favicon, might be under 5KB. You can check here: https://github.com/josharcheruk/CaptivePortal