Live data from Hacker News

Queen under medical supervision at Balmoral

bbc.co.uk

41–50 of 57 posts

Re: Queen under medical supervision at Balmoral

#41
post #32

Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic. "96 year old woman might die soon" is not a new or interesting phenomenon. Unless she wrote a compiler or published a whitepaper I'm unaware of, the Queen isn't relevant to this commun…

"96 year old woman might die soon" is not a new or interesting phenomenon. Unless she wrote a compiler or published a whitepaper I'm unaware of, the Queen isn't relevant to this community, and this isn't even news yet. Flagging.

Re: Queen under medical supervision at Balmoral

#42
post #32

Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic. "96 year old woman might die soon" is not a new or interesting phenomenon. Unless she wrote a compiler or published a whitepaper I'm unaware of, the Queen isn't relevant to this commun…

"96 year old woman might die soon" is not a new or interesting phenomenon. Unless she wrote a compiler or published a whitepaper I'm unaware of, the Queen isn't relevant to this community, and this isn't even news yet. Flagging.

Congrats, you've mastered copy and paste.

Re: Queen under medical supervision at Balmoral

#44

I don’t understand why people like kings, queens, popes and in the US Supreme Court justices don’t retire when they get old. Instead you see them being dragged out into the public while they are barely alive and certainly can’t perform their tasks in any reasonable manner. Retire in dignity and let younger people do a better job.

Leaving Charles in charge? Sometimes "over my dead body" is quite literal.

Re: Queen under medical supervision at Balmoral

#45
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"96 year old woman might die soon" is not a new or interesting phenomenon. Unless she wrote a compiler or published a whitepaper I'm unaware of, the Queen isn't relevant to this community, and this isn't even news yet. Flagging.

Congrats, you've mastered copy and paste.

Well, she’s the head of state of a number of countries and the commonwealth. Represents political and social continuity. This has historical significance, which might be of interest to some of the readership. She was trained as a mechanic and is one of the few old enough to have been an adult in the war. Her death might, maybe will, be responsible for a number of commonwealth states changing their structure of government.

Bit more significant to RL than one might think.

Re: Queen under medical supervision at Balmoral

#46
post #45
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Congrats, you've mastered copy and paste.

Well, she’s the head of state of a number of countries and the commonwealth. Represents political and social continuity. This has historical significance, which might be of interest to some of the readership. She was trained as a mechanic and is one of the few old enough to have been an adult in the war. Her death might, maybe will, be responsible for a number of commonwealth states changing their structure of govern…

And the owner of one of the largest investment firms in the world.

Re: Queen under medical supervision at Balmoral

#47
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think we (Brits) now draw with Norway for the most Female PMs (3 each). Of course 2 of these in the UK never won general elections...

Not true. Amazingly, Teresa May won one in 2017.

Ah damn, I always forget that one!

Re: Queen under medical supervision at Balmoral

#48

The article was published on Fri 17 Mar 2017 07.40 GMT when Theresa May was PM: > For Elizabeth II, the plan for what happens next is known as “London Bridge.” The prime minister will be woken, if she is not already awake, and civil servants will say “London Bridge is down” on secure lines. Interestingly, the current PM is also a she.

> The prime minister will be woken, Totally unrelated but is this correct grammar? I realize I've never seen "woken" without "up", as in "woken up". To avoid using "up" I would've leaned towards some form of awoke, but am not sure I've ever seen something like "she will be awoke" either. Always fun to encounter grammatical edge cases you're unfamiliar with in your native language.

-- getting into some cumbersome and annoying English - tenses and principal are often confusing - awoken is the most correctly - woken is fine - awoke is first person past principal - so you're right "she will be awoke" is grammatically incorrect - https://www.englishgrammar101.com/module-3/verbs-types-tense... --

Re: Queen under medical supervision at Balmoral

#50
post #8

Operation London Bridge https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/16/what-happens...

The other comment was downvoted, presumably people thinking it was a joke, but it is called Operation Unicorn too if she's in Scotland

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_London_Bridge#Operat...

Post reply on HN