Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the phony laptop story > the story looked suspicious (because it is) I’d love to hear this side of it. > they chose not to amplify it do you see a problem with this?
> I’d love to hear this side of it. RudyG finds a laptop of unknown provenance, riddled with likely to be stolen data, claiming to be owned by his boss' chief political rival's failson? The claim Rudy and co make is that the laptop proves Joe Biden corruptly forced Ukraine to fire someone to protect Hunter Biden's interests. It seems phony as hell because we know: 1. That prosecutor Biden lobbied Ukraine to fire was…
> No–I think not promoting a story that is likely to be false should be the default. Why should Facebook promote any story?
Because facebook isn’t the arbiter of truth.
I didn’t read the rest because it’s clearly biased.