Live data from Hacker News

OpenWrt 22.03

openwrt.org

61–70 of 133 posts

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#61
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you don't do anything out of the ordinary with your router is there any benefit to this over for example, the Netgear or tplink firmware?

Optional packages, installable on-the-fly Such as adblocking (pi-hole like experience without additional gear) ssh access, printserver, dynamic DNS, VPNs, different routing protocols, vlan support, tunneling protocols, monitoring, home Automation, wireguard, wpa3, OWE (encrypted open wifi), lots of goodies known from other linux distros, etc Here are some pointers on whats possible: https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-use…

Wireguard, particularly.

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#62
post #8

anyone can suggest a great openwrt compatible router in sub 50$ category?

if you want to solder and be on the cutting edge - mt7622 is really fast (based on arm-cortex so it's magnitudes faster than other wifi routers - wireguard is also a lot faster, reaching gigabit speeds) - xiaomi ax3200 for example is near sub https://openwrt.org/toh/xiaomi/ax3200 - how to flash via serial console: https://github.com/mikeeq/xiaomi_ax3200_openwrt

one caveat at the moment: 802.11ax is? was unstable.

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#64
post #50

I hoped this would fix the squashfs corruption[1][2][3] on the mt7621, but it doesn't seem so. It looks like I'll have to keep playing russian roulette on every boot for another two years, at least. [1]: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/patch-squashfs-data-probably-cor... [2]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/9085 [3]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/9729

Maybe replace with better hardware, if it is troublesome enough.

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#65
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I do as well but have a few complaints ;) glinet ship their own builds of a forked openwrt (most based on 19.x) containing proprietary patches and binaries. I got a handful of their most recent devices as of last year and all of those are officially still stuck on an ancient 19.x with several security issues that are fixed in upstream but don't make it down. Got the GL-MT1300 working with a self-built open-source Ope…

thanks for the info. It've had one old GL.Inet router sitting around, occasionally using it as a backup / test AP. Never realized their OpenWRT isn't stock... Is there an alternative HW You'd recommend for OpenWRT?

I'd give it a shot with vanilla OpenWRT first. As noted, it's very device-specific how open, supported, and accessible they are. Maybe you're lucky.

Other than that I'm yet to find anything that beats taking a generic x86 or aarch64 that happens to have a miniPCIe slot , put in appropriate wireless modules and treat it more like you would a normal linux installation. Separating AP/router duties between two separate devices will help a lot to simplify things whichever route you go (makes little sense for the "pocket travel router/ap" scenario obv).

OpenWRT has some great extensions and luci modules, some of which integrate very well. If you don't need them and want to do anything more than a standard home network setup, I'd consider if the trouble with OpenWRT is even worth it and set things up from a base debian/rocky/freebsd/openbsd/whatever base instead. Things that can be super time-consuming to get right in OpenWRT can actually be surprisingly straightforward once you remove their abstractions. Especially with nftables, if you're on Linux.

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#67
post #62
post #8

anyone can suggest a great openwrt compatible router in sub 50$ category?

if you want to solder and be on the cutting edge - mt7622 is really fast (based on arm-cortex so it's magnitudes faster than other wifi routers - wireguard is also a lot faster, reaching gigabit speeds) - xiaomi ax3200 for example is near sub https://openwrt.org/toh/xiaomi/ax3200 - how to flash via serial console: https://github.com/mikeeq/xiaomi_ax3200_openwrt one caveat at the moment: 802.11ax is? was unstable.

Somebody was saying mt762x has a long-standing squashfs bug ...

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#68
Tangential but on the topic of IP routers - recently my EdgeRouter X died. During autopsy, heat deformations were found on its Flash right next to an inductor for input DC-DC circuit.

So, naturally I hopped onto a train and bought a used NEC UNIVERGE IX2105 to replace with; a compact, fan-less, half A4 sized sheet metal pizza box with blue accent on matte white. Functionally a Cisco ISR 892J or 1941, physically smaller. Current models in its siblings range from ~$750 to $2.5k, however this Model 2105 is no longer officially supported, and are sold cheap in used market($30-50). It still has one GbE and one integral 4-port L3 switch, with up to 440Mbps advertised VPN throughput, an Apr/2022 built firmware, and full support for IPv6, OSPF, BGP, etc(that shamefully I had failed to understand).

I suspect it runs BSD in some shape or form as `show copyright` command shows licensing terms for FreeBSD and BSD library among others, but it won't let me drop into shell, nor does the typical *nix daemon parade on boot. The CLI is basically a Cisco, or like VyOS/Ubiquiti, except there are no obvious telltales of dancing bash contraptions and required facade massaging, unlike with many Linux-based routers. Firmware files for its lineage are also extremely small by modern standards(~8MB), RAM sizes are small too(16~128MB).

It does its things, and does well. A downside is it's proprietary. I used to run OpenWRT in 11b/g days but I suspect that was before it incorporated a unified config file. I was obviously on VyOS/EdgeOS until last week, and while it had served me good, it did trip over stones once in 2-3 years. I've also heard RouterOS is great but stable as Stable build bricking itself. I've used OpenWRT but that was before iPhone and perhaps before it even had a unified CLI configuration. Is OpenWRT better in stability/footprint/simplicity these days?

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#69
One question I have is: I would like my wifi router to be 100% "invisible", as in: I want the router to behave exactly as if it was an ethernet switch, where devices connected to the router via wifi would behave exactly as if they were connected to an ethernet switch.

In other words configure my router such that the only difference between it and a switch is the fact that connected devices are not connected via an ethernet cable but via a wifi connection.

I specifically don't want any kind of NAT, firewalling, filtering or any other kinf of "smart" features. Just a dumb switch that uses wifi instead of ethernet physical connections.

Does OpenWRT support this mode of operation?

Post reply on HN