The Long S
en.wikipedia.org
The Long S
1–10 of 83 posts
Re: The Long S
#2Re: The Long S
#3Keep clicking "next" on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1609_Doway_Old_Testament....
In summary, they (the authors of Douay-Rheims) based their bible translation on Jerome's 4th century Latin translation because they believed that the extant Greek and Hebrew versions had been corrupted by "Iewes and Heretikes".
Re: The Long S
#4I bought a 1st edition KJV (1611 reproduction) that had these all throughout. I couldn't make it past the introduction by the 'tranflators'
Re: The Long S
#5Read the preface to the 1st edition of this thing, and prepare for your mind to be blown: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douay%E2%80%93Rheims_Bible Keep clicking "next" on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1609_Doway_Old_Testament.... In summary, they (the authors of Douay-Rheims) based their bible translation on Jerome's 4th century Latin translation because they believed that the extant Greek and Hebrew versi…
Re: The Long S
#6Read the preface to the 1st edition of this thing, and prepare for your mind to be blown: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douay%E2%80%93Rheims_Bible Keep clicking "next" on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1609_Doway_Old_Testament.... In summary, they (the authors of Douay-Rheims) based their bible translation on Jerome's 4th century Latin translation because they believed that the extant Greek and Hebrew versi…
Not sure what am I looking for, but damn, the typography and typesetting of this 400 year old book is mind blowing.
Re: The Long S
#7Re: The Long S
#8Re: The Long S
#9> The „ſ“ [...] is no violation of (modern German) orthography, since the new [...] spelling rules do not prescribe how they should be implemented allographically.
Groſsartig, but please don't, at least if you don't use 𝔅𝔩𝔞𝔠𝔨𝔩𝔢𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰! :D