Sounds to me like this is pretty much the YC investment strategy: Fund good teams, and ignore the business plan because that's almost certainly going to change anyway.
See, there's one thing I don't really understand about the "fund good teams, ignore the business plan" strategy: can you ever consider a team to be "good" if they can't present you with at least a plausible business plan? Yes, the business plan will likely change, and being adaptable enough is important, but can a team be "good" without demonstrating the most basic ability to plan ahead?
Interesting funder's point of view
11–19 of 19 posts
Re: Interesting funder's point of view
#12Re: Interesting funder's point of view
#13Sounds to me like this is pretty much the YC investment strategy: Fund good teams, and ignore the business plan because that's almost certainly going to change anyway.
See, there's one thing I don't really understand about the "fund good teams, ignore the business plan" strategy: can you ever consider a team to be "good" if they can't present you with at least a plausible business plan? Yes, the business plan will likely change, and being adaptable enough is important, but can a team be "good" without demonstrating the most basic ability to plan ahead?
In a startup things are constantly changing so having a good team means they will do anything to overcome any obstacle. It is a quality that far exceeds any business plan.
Re: Interesting funder's point of view
#14Well, this sucks for all the shy guys here. Guess we'll have to go to Diana King for our funding.
Re: Interesting funder's point of view
#15Isn't it obvious?
Re: Interesting funder's point of view
#16Re: Interesting funder's point of view
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
See, there's one thing I don't really understand about the "fund good teams, ignore the business plan" strategy: can you ever consider a team to be "good" if they can't present you with at least a plausible business plan? Yes, the business plan will likely change, and being adaptable enough is important, but can a team be "good" without demonstrating the most basic ability to plan ahead?
I think he does not mean don't build a business plan. The process of building a business plan is a great exercise for any startup. It helps them figure out a lot of holes in their plan or lack thereof. In a startup things are constantly changing so having a good team means they will do anything to overcome any obstacle. It is a quality that far exceeds any business plan.
Re: Interesting funder's point of view
#18Making the comparison: 1. great team = likeability of the singer as a person 2. great business = their ability to sing
How many singers have 1. but still fail? How many seem to have both and still fail?
I think you have to be top dog in both areas.
But then I'm not an investor :p
Re: Interesting funder's point of view
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
See, there's one thing I don't really understand about the "fund good teams, ignore the business plan" strategy: can you ever consider a team to be "good" if they can't present you with at least a plausible business plan? Yes, the business plan will likely change, and being adaptable enough is important, but can a team be "good" without demonstrating the most basic ability to plan ahead?
I think he does not mean don't build a business plan. The process of building a business plan is a great exercise for any startup. It helps them figure out a lot of holes in their plan or lack thereof. In a startup things are constantly changing so having a good team means they will do anything to overcome any obstacle. It is a quality that far exceeds any business plan.