Live data from Hacker News

Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3

matthewbilyeu.com

121–130 of 135 posts

Re: Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3

#121
post #82
post #2

I'm sure some folks will see this as dishonest or unethical, but it feels more like the natural evolution of getting spammed by recruiters. If recruiters are going to endlessly spam me with their templates and automation, it only seems fair that my response is also templates and automation.

Sir, may I interested you in my automated template spam reply system for dealing with automated template spam recruiters? https://github.com/drcongo/spammy-recruiters

Interesting. Is there a US variant out there, too?

(This one looks promising: https://github.com/jceloria/recruiter-spam/blob/master/list....)

Re: Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3

#123

Taking into account that some sort of automated tool also generates recruiter letters and follow-ups - we witnessed a fight of two computers without any value in it for anyone.

If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

Only with Universe Standard and above

Re: Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3

#124

My response to recruiters (especially on LinkedIn) is always the same; “Please send over all relevant details for the role you had in mind (JD, company and salary)”. This filters out about 90% of them, and especially those who’re just fishing for clients.

I used to do the same thing but I got tired of doing that (and they didn’t always respond with the details, but often with another request). Now I just send them to https://polyfill.work . They have to enter pay, etc. and if it’s a fit for me I’ll hear about it. (Disclaimer: I made polyfill and it’s a work in progress but I’m looking for feedback on the developer onboarding part so let me have it if it sucks!). I don…

I got curious, but even after reload it won’t go past step 4

Re: Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3

#125
post #110
post #108

Does this violate OpenAI's terms of service? Or is it OK because you're the only user so it isn't a "production application"? They are quite clear that any AI produced text needs to be explicitly labeled so that nobody could mistake it for human written. (I think this is hilarious, but just letting you know so you don't get banned or something.)

It's not obvious to me that this qualifies as "AI-produced". The actual response is a form email, and GPT-3 is getting used as a, like, parser for the recruiter email.

You're right, my bad.

Re: Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3

#126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, what this does is really separates the wheat from the chaff. If the company can't tell me the salary or the job, it's not a good fit anyways. Interestingly, what this means is that Google is not a good fit at all. They wanted me to talk to a sourcer, who would connect me to a recruiter. That's too much corporate foreplay for me, especially without even knowing what team I'd be joining.

> corporate foreplay Hello, new vocabulary entry!

Maybe they'll even buy you a lobster dinner before they fuck you.

Re: Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3

#127

> This solution worked well for the handful of emails I tried it on. I’m planning to run this on a cron to save myself some time and automatically maintain recruiter relationships. Maintain recruiter relationships?! You're sending a glorified autoreply that plugs in a couple values. That is not maintaining a relationship. Luckily, there's no relationship to maintain, because the recruiter probably just blasted out an…

That jumped out at me too. Not even close to a 'relationship'.

Re: Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3

#129

As one article taught me about over a year ago respond by sending a well formulated email requesting the salary and job offering. Sometimes it leads to you understanding the market. Sometimes it leads to negotiation for higher salary. Sometimes an amazing new job. So far this has never failed me. And is far better than ignoring. I only really ignore the crypto companies.

Also, what this does is really separates the wheat from the chaff. If the company can't tell me the salary or the job, it's not a good fit anyways. Interestingly, what this means is that Google is not a good fit at all. They wanted me to talk to a sourcer, who would connect me to a recruiter. That's too much corporate foreplay for me, especially without even knowing what team I'd be joining.

While I agree, its also a way to

a) know the market

b) not interview for 4-8 hours only to find out they are going to pay you 30k less than your current job (yep had that, never make that mistake again)

Re: Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3

#130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I used to do the same thing but I got tired of doing that (and they didn’t always respond with the details, but often with another request). Now I just send them to https://polyfill.work . They have to enter pay, etc. and if it’s a fit for me I’ll hear about it. (Disclaimer: I made polyfill and it’s a work in progress but I’m looking for feedback on the developer onboarding part so let me have it if it sucks!). I don…

I got curious, but even after reload it won’t go past step 4

Thanks for giving it a go! I’ll check sentry, etc. to see if there’s anything obvious.

On the off chance you see this reply: what browser/device were you using?

I also see that step 4 is the first multiple choice question, so it doesn’t auto-scroll to the next question (you have to hit “next” to move on).

It’s not obvious. Perhaps the culprit here is just bad UI.

Post reply on HN