Live data from Hacker News

Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

osrp.lanl.gov

201–210 of 277 posts

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#202
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just because you pay a positive non-zero amount for less than a quarter of the energy in, it does not mean that a device has greater than 100% efficiency, which is not possible. If heat pumps are 400% efficient then log burners in cabins in the woods are even better.

All energy from log burners comes from the fuel, and some ashes remain unburnt. They're under 100% efficient at converting fuel to heat. You put in x fuel and A heat pump takes heat from outside the system. You put in x fuel and you get >x heat. Getting more energy than you put in makes the efficiency over 100%.

> They're under 100% efficient at converting fuel to heat

I think only matter-antimatter reaction comes close to 100%. Burning fuels isn't even 1% of that.

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The doctors that sign off the cremation have to provide info on pacemakers/artificial joints and so on to the crematorium

> artificial joints Would you have to remove the joints as well then? How are you meant to properly dispose of something like a knee or a hip?

Make it a modern art piece? Titanium hips look pretty dope

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The doctors that sign off the cremation have to provide info on pacemakers/artificial joints and so on to the crematorium

> artificial joints Would you have to remove the joints as well then? How are you meant to properly dispose of something like a knee or a hip?

But, for real, there’s companies that recycle artificial joints.

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

You are getting downvoted for the conspiracy theory aspect of your post and for throwing shade on a guy with the pacemaker. If you care about being liked, say likeable things.

No post body was provided.

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#207
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A heat pump warms a home more efficiently than using the same amount of electricity for resistive heating. It can do this because it's not generating the heat from scratch; it's moving heat from outside to inside. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_pump#Performance

A local company has developed a heat pump with a thermal energy storage system. Not sure how they do this, but I imagine there is some sort of insulated cinder blocks on a secondary loop that shuttles heat/cold to where it needs to go. (1) https://stash.energy/en/product/

They try very hard not to be specific, but the industrial heat accumulators are usually just water.

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#209
post #12
post #5

Just got me thinking: What would it take for us to get to a point where there are small, safe nuclear powered "batteries", that can supply enough electricity for a building.

Nice in theory but what if they fall into the wrong hands?

It's already in the wrong hands

Re: Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers

#210

If it is a dead body and it is being cremated you take it out so it doesn't explode in the crematorium. I say this as a former funeral director who had to remove them.

>Pacemaker explosions in crematoria: problems and possible solutions https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1279940/

Fascinating read and a lovely example of a simple and pragmatic socioscientific study. Cool!
Post reply on HN