Be aware of the energy you are wasting, a modern tv uses much less power than a crt.
Be aware of the energy you are wasting, a modern AI uses much less power than a human.
Now you listen, If I’m going to be replaced by an
AI it’s not going to be for some boring economical reason.
It’ll be because I‘ve been deemed surplus to requirements by the algorithm and smooshed down into base nutrients with everyone else, thank you very much.
Obviously the biggest advantage of having a CRT again is reliving the glory days of pointing my SNES Super Scope at it and blasting away at Yoshi's Safari, Battle Clash and Metal Combat!
They have sad sadly in a box for far too long, I really need to go find an old crt and stop living in shame.
Next up, article on the advantages of eating cyanide. Doesn't matter about the advantages - the disadvantages far outweigh them.
What’s the disadvantage of crts that outweighs all the advantages?
It is mostly the weight and physical space the tube requires. They use a lot of desk space and require a decent quality desk to hold them. They also use somewhat more power than LCDs but I suspect LCDs more modern look and space saving qualities drove their adoption much more than the power usage. The way their refresh rate works also seems to cause a lot less eyestrain on LCDs, particular when comparing a low quality CRT to a low quality LCD.
There's something so comfy looking about CRT monitors. I know it's just nostalgia, but there's something in that. I've been playing a lot of Sega Mega Drive (Genesis) recently. The games are alright, but honestly they kind of suck when objectively compared to modern games. I still enjoy them though, but that's because they take me back to simpler times. I'm not sure I'd use a CRT monitor for any of it's tech specs, b…
I don't think a lot of them sucked at all compared to modern games. Forced constraints lead to wonderful creativity and strong - even if simple - game design.
Sure the games might not have had as much breadth or depth at times, but I feel today's games are far more generic in general, you have to go searching for interesting concepts, rather than just browsing what is 'on the shelf' at the shops.
Adding one not-missed item to the list: the annoying high pitch whine
15KHz aprox. Not every body notices it
At what age does it go away to hear this?
I'm in my late 30s and I still hear it. But seemingly none of my co-workers can.
I know because once one put a "test your hearing" website and they all thought it was a sham until I told them to cut it out with the annoying whistle.
But I thought by now I would no longer be annoyed by those.
I can't imagine loving a monitor the way I loved my iiyama Vision Master Pro. 1600x1200 at 71Hz driven from a Matrox Millennium (4MB VRAM and no 3D acceleration whatsoever) with soft-edged pixels and no visible grain or mesh. It was by far the best computer-related object I had ever owned. But that would be so impractical now, given its bulk and what else is available. We actually still have a CRT as our main TV here…
The Matrox cards were awesome, I had a 21" sony monitor that could be pushed up to 1800x1600 with those cards. I probably have some in the stack somewhere still.
That's only for TVs, though. Computer monitors had higher refresh rates and were not audible.
I could hear them. They can't have been that high.
What you hear is the horizontal refresh rate, scanlines per second. For NTSC television and CGA video, that's 15.7 KHz and within the audible range of quite a few humans. 640x480x60fps noninterlaced VGA is twice that at 31.4 KHz, which mostly isn't audible although a very few exceptional cases might. Higher resolutions are higher still, of course. That said, as with anything involving analog frequencies, there might be harmonics or resonances that could be in a range you can hear.
It did? I thought they're advertising themselves based on how effectively they can blind you. You could turn down the brightness on a CRT down to 10% or less at night and still use it.
Why can’t you turn the brightness down on your lcd?
You can, but people aren't going to bother, when it's three levels deep of on-screen menus, accessed with tiny buttons, mounted in an awkward place, labeled with cryptic icons. Much more cumbersome user experience than turning a single dial on a CRT.
When I was a desktop tech, visiting a user with a problem, I carried a laser pointer with me. I could point to elements on the screen without getting my fingerprints on the glass and without invading the user's personal space. Laser pointers are pretty much useless on LCD. Not that I would ever go back; but it was a nice feature at the time.