Live data from Hacker News

foo@bar.com is a real email address

bar.com

81–90 of 98 posts

Re: foo@bar.com is a real email address

#81
post #80
post #17

I thought this is basic knowledge of everyone technically engaged in Internet stuff. But apparently, this isn't the case, despite its well-known and very readable documentation! [1] It says: 1) There are exactly 3 domains the IANA keeps free for that purpose: example.com example.net example.org 2) In addition, all domains under the following 3 top level domains can be used freely for that purpose: *.test *.example *.…

doh, test@test.com must be pissed.

the guy who owns test.com emailed me once because I wrote a paper on IIS vulnerabilities and had 'test.com' as example URL's. turns out a lot of people reading my paper would copy+paste the example exploits and own the test.com server (which just happen to be running IIS).

Re: foo@bar.com is a real email address

#82
post #59
post #17

I thought this is basic knowledge of everyone technically engaged in Internet stuff. But apparently, this isn't the case, despite its well-known and very readable documentation! [1] It says: 1) There are exactly 3 domains the IANA keeps free for that purpose: example.com example.net example.org 2) In addition, all domains under the following 3 top level domains can be used freely for that purpose: *.test *.example *.…

So I've wondered this for a long time. Where does email sent to wildcard@example.com go? If I accidentally sent sensitive information to wildcard@example.com would some evil person (potentially at the IANA) be able to retrieve it someday?

Currently: no. In the future: don't bet on it

Re: foo@bar.com is a real email address

#83
I can only imagine the volume this guy gets - I have user24@gmail.com and I get about an email a week signing me up for something or other. It's very annoying.

So if anyone's reading this: Please stop using random gmail accounts and use foo@bar.com instead. Thanks!

* just kidding, test@example.com would be the one to go for ;)

Re: foo@bar.com is a real email address

#84
post #66

If you really need to receive a test email, you can always use @mailinator.com (just make sure it's not sensitive info). Mailinator is a disposable, publicly viewable email address mostly useful for one-time account registrations, especially in cases where you fear they might spam you. In recent years, I started using the + notation at gmail -- anything you put after the + and before the @ is ignored by gmail, BUT yo…

The "+" trick is great, except for sites that use hair-brained email "validation" scripts which reject the address. Sadly enough, these are often the ones that I most want to use the "+" for (its a great way to also keep track of who hands out your email address to spammers).

I have the solution for you there:

If your email is mylittlepony@gmail.com

Then your can use as many '.' and filter it out.

You will also receive emails sendt too my.little.pony@gmail.com

M.y.l.i.t.t.l.e.p.o.n.y@gmail.com

Gmail ignores punktum. Thats smart!

Re: foo@bar.com is a real email address

#85
post #29

That is so true... Most developers who get an account with Mailgun ( http://mailgun.net ) get so excited about the live email log or for some other reason... they love to fire up emails to @test.com. We have thousands of emails in our queue destined for test.com at any given moment. Guys, please stop: what makes you think test.com can't be a real destination? :-) Actually, they don't have a mail server for that domai…

Some should setup a MX on test.com and: * post a public webpage with all email going to @test.com * post a public webpage with all email addresses harvested from emails to @test.com Or * setup an auto responder asking people to stop sending there (bonus points: threaten to post emails of repeat offenders to spammer lists)

Whenever you think the solution is to "setup an auto responder".... don't.

Re: foo@bar.com is a real email address

#86
post #29

That is so true... Most developers who get an account with Mailgun ( http://mailgun.net ) get so excited about the live email log or for some other reason... they love to fire up emails to @test.com. We have thousands of emails in our queue destined for test.com at any given moment. Guys, please stop: what makes you think test.com can't be a real destination? :-) Actually, they don't have a mail server for that domai…

Some should setup a MX on test.com and: * post a public webpage with all email going to @test.com * post a public webpage with all email addresses harvested from emails to @test.com Or * setup an auto responder asking people to stop sending there (bonus points: threaten to post emails of repeat offenders to spammer lists)

See also donotreply.com:

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/03/they_told...

Re: foo@bar.com is a real email address

#88
post #16

I frequently use aa@aa.aa - last time I checked, there were no countries using .aa

To you and everyone using things != .+@example.com: why? Example.(com|net|org) were specifically created for this purpose and for the purpose of tutorials. I work in client-facing support, and it's very easy to troubleshoot software that /other people/ write when the client says something along the lines of "It says 'connection to example.com:25 failed'" -- I instantly know what the problem is. If you're using things…

>well, that's a lame non-excuse.

Ignorance is a legitimate excuse. I'm getting sick of people spreading this moronic misunderstanding that ignorance is not an excuse. Just recently the police in NYC failed to follow a judge's order out of ignorance. I wonder what excuse they used.

As for why people don't use example.com, if you're signing up for a site that annoyingly makes you put in a password it will check for non-real email addresses so example.com is out.

Re: foo@bar.com is a real email address

#90
post #81
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

doh, test@test.com must be pissed.

the guy who owns test.com emailed me once because I wrote a paper on IIS vulnerabilities and had 'test.com' as example URL's. turns out a lot of people reading my paper would copy+paste the example exploits and own the test.com server (which just happen to be running IIS).

Man, this is really beautiful. Care to share more details? (I suppose all exploits are long patched now). It could be an interesting blog post...
Post reply on HN