Let me start by making the same point, but starting from a different place.
When you see pi, you look for a circle. When you see an 8 or 12 or 24 or 60, you see a few small primes multiplied together, and you might look for things that like being flexibly divided into clean subgroups.
Now I spent a couple of hours trying to extend my original argument, using the internet.
12tet (12 tone equal temperament) gives you good fourths and fifths (which as you say sound great) and TET. What you don't get is being able to correctly voice say a barbershop seventh, or persian music, or dissonant death metal, or microtonal pop.
While n-TET for any n is possible, Wikipedia lists 5, 7, 12, 15, 17, 19, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 31, 34, 41, 46, 53, 72, and 96tet as being in use, some much more popular than others. Arabic music shifted from 17tet to 24tet, with the exception of some holdouts that find 24tet too 'commercial'.
You don't need bang-on fourths and fifths to be happy in n-tet; given n-tet, you figure out what intervals to use, what kind of chords you want to build, and what kind of scales you are willing to learn to use those chords.
So, fourths and fifths are good in 12tet, and you covered that. Is there anything else to say about 12tet and its popularity, particularly about there being 12 notes and its prime factorization into 2s and 3s?
From stackexchange: You can create a circle of any number of steps mutually prime to the total number of pitches in the octave.
And what it looks like is that you get a Circle of Fifths that has some particularly nice properties in 12tet due to the math with 2/3/5, and that makes scales and chord building particularly easy, making 12tet easy to work with, and that further popularizes 12tet. I just waved my hands there pretty hard; I did not do anywhere near enough due diligence on sources. But, yes, the number of notes does end up being important. Probably.
So I think I was minorly correct in being suspicious of '12' and how divisible it was into small primes, but majorly wrong in most other aspects.
As an aside, I did read your article, and just had a different take on what was going on; I was sure that the prime factorization structure of '12' would explain more than it does.