Live data from Hacker News

What would a “good” WebMD look like?

blog.tjcx.me

1–10 of 323 posts

Re: What would a “good” WebMD look like?

#4
Sure this article is spammy self-promotion, but their prototype is exciting. I’d use it. It’s frustrating to go to a drugstore and see medicines for a cough, let’s say, each with a different active ingredient, and be unable to find concrete information comparing the effectiveness of each ingredient.

And wow, the WebMD article they mentioned on essential oils was terrible. It really lowers my opinion of WebMD. At this point I get more helpful information about medicines from Reddit.

Re: What would a “good” WebMD look like?

#8
To take the example of Aspirin and Essential Oils, NHS has no ads and has information on Aspirin https://www.nhs.uk/medicines/aspirin-for-pain-relief/ , but doesn't have information on Essential Oils. It probably doesn't list supporting evidence because most people don't want to read it and wouldn't understand it.

Re: What would a “good” WebMD look like?

#9
I wish I could have had a 35% to 40% satisfaction rate with the various actual medical professionals I've dealt with in-person over the years.

I'd say that fewer than one in five such encounters has left me feeling like I got good advice, and a favourable outcome. Even just a 25% satisfaction rate would be a notable improvement for me.

Post reply on HN