Live data from Hacker News

The silent majority in software

vadimkravcenko.com

21–30 of 371 posts

Re: The silent majority in software

#21
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The phrase "HN/Reddit" is weird by itself. This place feels so different from Reddit.

HN is like what Reddit used to be. Heavy emphasis on news, technology. Usually some interesting debate in the comments when they were added. Found some screenshots from the early years: https://www.reddit.com/r/historyofreddit/comments/q1zks/redd...

That's what I expected. It used to be niche.

Re: The silent majority in software

#25
There are thousands of Java developers in the US who make $80,000 a year and live a fantastic life.

No leetcode, no Bay Area, no FAANG.

Just people writing the code responsible for our banking, travel, supermarkets and many other systems which underpin our society.

Re: The silent majority in software

#26

>And that’s fine, we’re all amateurs, and sometimes we can be wrong. I'm not an amateur. Or if I am than everyone is too since I have written software for project that would kill tens of thousands if it fails. Other than that the vocal minority was always my opinion on Rust. A small core of true believers who decided that convincing people they should change the world is worth more than actually doing any work in Rus…

Such a saying is what the incompetent obsessively repeat to themselves. They can't stand by the thought of people who don't need an Internet connection to program, who don't copy and paste from the fools over at StackOverflow, and the many other things they do which their betters don't.

The fools over at Reddit call some things "adulting", because the idea of growing out of childhood is so foreign to them that they'd rather make it childish too. It's the same basic disease.

Re: The silent majority in software

#28
post #15

I may belong to that silent majority. I have learnt a lot from the discussions here in HN and other sites, but I rarely participate on them. This post made me think about being a little more active because, sincerely, most of the times it is just laziness what prevents me from commenting anything. In fact, this is my first comment here in HN. Little by little.

For me it's more that I think a comment should really "bring something" : a new perspective or a complement of information.

That's why there are places on the internet (like here) where, usually, I don't find the usual online fluff content.

Re: The silent majority in software

#29
post #8

> The “silent majority” was used by President Richard Nixon during his presidency and his campaign against the Vietnam war. He spoke to the people who were not actively voicing their opinions and who were overshadowed by the vocal few who were supporting the war. This is a shocking misunderstanding of history. The “silent majority” Nixon spoke of were folks opposed to anti-war protests . Nixon intentionally prolonged…

Fixed it. Thank you :) Just took the quote directly from Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_majority#:~:text=The%20...

Re: The silent majority in software

#30
post #17

> There also seems to be an assumption on HN/Reddit that vocal activity on the internet, in any form — be that videos, blogging, podcasts, etc. — is proportional to activity behind the screen. Personally, I dislike this attitude. I think the internet is a good signal for what will be in the streets in 2-4 years time unabated. The attitude OP reflects is one that was valid in the 90s and early 2000s, but not today.

No, I think that's very wrong, now more than ever. What you read "on the internet" is almost always fabricated and published with manipulative intent and asymetric capabilities to promote a product, lang/skill, or whatever. It's the negative comments you should care about.
Post reply on HN