Live data from Hacker News

Web3 Domain Name Service Could Lose Web Address-Owner Who Can Renew Is in Prison

coindesk.com

11–20 of 86 posts

Re: Web3 Domain Name Service Could Lose Web Address-Owner Who Can Renew Is in Prison

#11

It is really interesting why he is in prison. Basically for attending a tech conference in North Korea. Frankly, this reminds me of the Soviet times.

I personally know two people who were invited to that conference as speakers, but decided against it.

Re: Web3 Domain Name Service Could Lose Web Address-Owner Who Can Renew Is in Prison

#13
Giving a totally new dimension to "bus factor".

No organization should tie their infrastructure maintenance to individuals, but processes are really hard to consolidate and automate and knowledge is not easily shared either.

Curious as to how other people approach reducing their bus factor.

Re: Web3 Domain Name Service Could Lose Web Address-Owner Who Can Renew Is in Prison

#16
post #12

I like to keep important domains paid up many years in advance. Some TLDs don't allow this. I wonder if .link is one of those.

some registrars let you keep a balance, so even if you can't pay in advance, you can load up your account balance so instead of trying to bill your card it just deducts your balance. Idk why godaddy wouldn't have this so I assume he just didn't keep an account balance.

Re: Web3 Domain Name Service Could Lose Web Address-Owner Who Can Renew Is in Prison

#17

Hey thanks, GoDaddy for releasing a statement[0] instead of fixing the problem. They literally choose this over siding with the customer and their lawyer. [0] https://aboutus.godaddy.net/newsroom/company-news/news-detai...

I thought that the problem was the web3 people pretending to build decentralised services while in fact they're relying on a convicted criminal to renew a domain?

Re: Web3 Domain Name Service Could Lose Web Address-Owner Who Can Renew Is in Prison

#18

It is really interesting why he is in prison. Basically for attending a tech conference in North Korea. Frankly, this reminds me of the Soviet times.

"Basically" is doing a lot of work in that sentence:

> In September, Griffith pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate international sanctions against North Korea. Griffith was arrested in November 2019 after giving a talk at a cryptocurrency conference in Pyongyang in April of that year.

> “What you see here is an intentionality…and a desire to educate people on how to evade sanctions,” [U.S. District Judge Kevin] Castel said.

> Judge Castel read a series of text messages and emails from Griffith in which the defendant admits to sharing information with North Korea for the express purpose of helping the repressive Kim regime evade sanctions.

> What the judge found most damning, perhaps, was a photo of Griffith presenting at the conference, wearing a traditional North Korean suit and standing in front of a blackboard on which it read “No sanctions!” with a smiley face.

https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/04/12/former-ethereum...

Re: Web3 Domain Name Service Could Lose Web Address-Owner Who Can Renew Is in Prison

#19
post #5
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no problem to 'fix'. The people who paid for eth.link domains do not own them, so GoDaddy has zero obligation to even acknowledge their existence. Hell, they're lucky they even got a statement at all, if I was them I'd just start selling off the domains slowly while I watch Twitter melt down.

> if I was them I'd just start selling off the domains slowly while I watch Twitter melt down. Why do something you know to be bad and will lead to many people being angry? Why not... be nice and helpful?

It's against my libertarian ethos.

Re: Web3 Domain Name Service Could Lose Web Address-Owner Who Can Renew Is in Prison

#20
Will domains have to be renewed at all in the future?

When you put a transaction on the Bitcoin blockchain, it will stay there forever. You don't have to renew it.

Why not the same for domains? You put "mydomain > 111.222.333.444 signed: me, the mydomain owner" on a blockchain and as long as you do not put another signed message that overrides it, it points to 111.222.333.444 forever.

Post reply on HN