Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Subreddit Finder – find subreddits based on a topic

segue.co

21–30 of 36 posts

Re: Show HN: Subreddit Finder – find subreddits based on a topic

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the other hand googling "soaring reddit", "gliders reddit" or "gliding reddit" shows r/Gliding top of the list.

I would wager upto 10% of all Google searches are [$query + reddit]

I would take the other side of that bet for whatever amount of money you’d like.

Re: Show HN: Subreddit Finder – find subreddits based on a topic

#23
post #3

I tried searching for the programming language 'perl' expecting https://old.reddit.com/r/perl/ The results only showed 'LaTeX' and 'me_irl' (a meme subreddit). Good results for 'php', 'ruby', 'node', 'pascal', 'haskell'

Thanks @mtmail for your feedback, will take a look and figure out what heppened to perl. It might be because of our training data, as perl gets less popular, our training data might simply not having enough good data. : )

My bet is that the stanzas believe the user is searching for Pearl. Perl is not in the English dictionary.

Re: Show HN: Subreddit Finder – find subreddits based on a topic

#24

Is this based on some sort of public reddit dataset or do they scrape all of reddit? I just did some searches but couldn't find any proper / official reddit data dumps. Does something like that exist?

Pushshift comes to mind: https://github.com/pushshift/api

There are a couple different clients for it on GitHub

Re: Show HN: Subreddit Finder – find subreddits based on a topic

#27
I think a better use is the Map of Reddit (https://anvaka.github.io/map-of-reddit/) which shows links between reddit communities. Start from one you know you are interested in and bounce around exploring the nearby community, or zoom out and see the large community blocks.

Re: Show HN: Subreddit Finder – find subreddits based on a topic

#28
post #9

Unpopular (?) opinion: marketing is killing the internet for absolutely no value to users. At one point, we had communities of people, and discussions, and things were ok. Then came a mountain of commercial, automated, focused psyops against users: spaming, shilling, astoturfing, censoring, profiling, brigading, ab testing, engagement tracking, JS, ad auctions, eye tracking and on and on. Reddit used to be a communit…

What you describe still exists, and with much more variety than what Old Reddit offered. All it takes is the time to seek out the right subreddits for your interests. Places like /r/askhistorians have no equivalent anywhere else on the internet.

The site may crumble under its own weight in the coming years, but it won't be because it offers no discussion.

Re: Show HN: Subreddit Finder – find subreddits based on a topic

#30
post #28
post #9

Unpopular (?) opinion: marketing is killing the internet for absolutely no value to users. At one point, we had communities of people, and discussions, and things were ok. Then came a mountain of commercial, automated, focused psyops against users: spaming, shilling, astoturfing, censoring, profiling, brigading, ab testing, engagement tracking, JS, ad auctions, eye tracking and on and on. Reddit used to be a communit…

What you describe still exists, and with much more variety than what Old Reddit offered. All it takes is the time to seek out the right subreddits for your interests. Places like /r/askhistorians have no equivalent anywhere else on the internet. The site may crumble under its own weight in the coming years, but it won't be because it offers no discussion.

Sure, we agree the rich discussions are still there holding a low profile. I even moderate one or two of them.

The challenge is, as soon as you start systematically introducing psyops into a quality discussion, every message becomes suspect and the quality retreats. What would happen if every thread on /r/askhistorians has someone popping in and saying "I see you're talking about the Battle of Gettysburg! Did you know there's an etsy shop you can buy official artifacts over [here]?" And more to the point, how will /r/historians defend against professionals steering discussions about, eg, slavery or the annexation of Tibet or the religious views of the Signers? I am worried.

Post reply on HN