Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll double down on the quoted line. Do you care about the laptop because it's ostensibly proof of corruption or because it tarnishes the reputation of the sitting president? If it's the latter then go pound sand. If it's the former, then good, let's investigate and root out the corruption and address it in a court of law. But that requires being open to treating similar treatment of corruption by the prior administr…
It's buried in my own verbiage, but this is the thrust of my reply. If you rely, for your mental picture of what is ... important and what can be dismissed, on the same institutions that suppress true stories and promote false ones, then how even are you making these choices? At the risk of distracting you from answering that question, I'll answer yours: partisan feuding is destroying the US, so I absolutely put coun…
With respect, that's not all anyone can do, and it's not nearly enough. My answer[2] isn't perfect, but in order not to be influenced by partisan lies in a mediascape that is actively hostile to truth, one must be more active than that.