The perfect shot! XD
Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
991–1000 of 1001 posts
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#992Earlier quoted context omitted.
In your example link here: https://i.imgur.com/bS7ERC6.jpg you show one fellow with a smartphone stabbed through the chest, plus a headphone cord fused into his forearm veins. When you "let it churn away for a week," which of the following is more likely: 1. Smartphone Stab Wound Guys decrease in likelihood 2. More realistic-looking smartphone stabs In either case it doesn't exactly inspire confidence in self-driving…
In a future Tesla shareholders meeting: “Version 10.2 can detect children crossing the road with 97% accuracy, and collides with them dead on at the same rate. Those well publicised close calls are now a thing of the past!”
The good news: we kill less people.
The bad news: when we do, it's unfathomable how anything but a computer could do this
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#993It might be worth reminding Australians in the audience that possession of pornographic drawings or cartoons of figures deemed to be "childlike" is considered equivalent to possession of actual child pornography, in this country. As a result I suspect this kind of site and the diffusion model tech is dangerous for Australians to use until there are more deliberate guarantees against the creation of such images. Our laws will lag technology for many years, but the result here is a chilling effect whereby I'm not willing to even explore it much for fear of potential unintended consequences.
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#994Eventually this and similar technology will be able to generate unlimited porn of all types. Including CP. Should or even could it be made illegal? To me that kinda feels like if it was made illegal then you are basically acting as the thought police. Edit: are people just uncomfortable talking about this or do they think downvoting is going to somehow prevent it?
Watching CP tends to reinforce paedophilic tendencies. Many folks seem to "common sense assume" that it's a safe outlet and it would be nice if that were true, but it's not.
I hear this repeated verbatim a lot as if it were objectively true, along with the idea that watching porn in general is psychologically unhealthy, but I have yet to see any legitimate peer reviewed studies to corroborate either of these positions.
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#995Eventually this and similar technology will be able to generate unlimited porn of all types. Including CP. Should or even could it be made illegal? To me that kinda feels like if it was made illegal then you are basically acting as the thought police. Edit: are people just uncomfortable talking about this or do they think downvoting is going to somehow prevent it?
There's prolly gonna be a big controversy when pedos start using it that way and proof is posted on mainstream websites.
I've just discovered lexica.art and I love all picture generator AI tools, but when stumbling upon some pictures of young Emma Watson topless, it didn't seem ok, and reading the prompt for these images showed that the user didn't go for tags like "young" or "topless", it's just StableDiffusion randomly selecting these features, maybe because there's wierd content about Emma Watson online on shady sites, maybe something else.
I'm not sure I want all of them to close access to these tools, stop providing open source capabilities, or prevent specific keywords like Dall-E does, but it's the easy solution for providers. This is why we can't have nice things (there's so many interesting, funny and beautiful things that aren't illegal or even controversial but that are blocked as side-effects of Dall-E's restrictions).
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#996I've been waiting for the yiff version of https://thisfursonadoesnotexist.com/ to come out, normies beat us to the punch!
It's not like there's a shortage of artist-drawn/rendered yiff for all tastes to fill the gap.
Yeah, that's very true. And increasingly well curated via tags, too.
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#997To be clear I'm not making any statements about the creator, I imagine this is a reflection of the dataset: but the fact that there are so many categories for east Asian (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and I hazard that the "Asian" tag would probably mostly generate east Asians) says volumes about the sexualizing gaze cast on Asian women. While certainly there's an ethical argument over such an algorithm (both for and ag…
Keep in mind this AI is biased towards white men's interests which means it heavily fetishizes and degrades Asian women.
Even searching for other races shows predominantly Asian women in the results, its quite disturbing.
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#998Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#999You're not making tools; you're making weapons that blow up in our face. Programmers could make 1000 great AI sites, but it will only take a few bad ones to earn enduring hostility from society to AI (and forums that promulgate bad anti-social uses of AI). Porn objectifies all women (and men), reducing everyone's ability to have real relationships by setting expectations and creating doubts about your partner's real…
Isn't "abusing" technologies and thus accelerating policy change the manifestation of the hacker spirit? Like Piracy and DRM?
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#1000I had some fun with StyleGAN a couple years ago. I should probably have written this up, or something. Some others I showed it too thought I should. But I never took it too serious. I was just bored over a couple weekends when I had access to some beefy GPUs. And y'know, it's quasi-porno. I opted for dudes not gals. Part personal preference, partly because I happened to get my hands on an enormous dataset of hot shir…
> partly because I happened to get my hands on an enormous dataset of hot shirtless guys taking selfies.
I feel like this is burying the lede. I'm very curious where you sourced this training data.