Amazon is not going to make a bid for Electronic Arts – sources
71–80 of 266 posts
Re: Amazon is not going to make a bid for Electronic Arts – sources
#721, Amazon runs the platform that sells the games - Amazon 2, Amazon runs the platform that people use while playing the games - Twitch 3, Amazon runs the platform that hosts the servers to play the games - AWS 4, Amazon runs the platform that you play the game on - Luna 5, Amazon runs the platform that creates the games - EA how is this not anti-competition for anyone running a company that competes in only one of th…
Re: Amazon is not going to make a bid for Electronic Arts – sources
#73Alexa will watch to make sure you pay those micro transactions. And if you don’t, get ready to fight the roomba they send after you!
HAHA! enjoyed visualising that ... thanks ... (I am assuming you're joking here, but ... hmmm on seconds thoughts. Give it 10 years and ...).
Re: Amazon is not going to make a bid for Electronic Arts – sources
#74Will there ever be a point where as a society we agree to put an upper cap on the size of companies? Does Amazon really need to absorb even more? Doesn’t that stifle competition? I understand that enforcement is hard as the rule wouldn’t be global, but still curious.
Re: Amazon is not going to make a bid for Electronic Arts – sources
#75Will there ever be a point where as a society we agree to put an upper cap on the size of companies? Does Amazon really need to absorb even more? Doesn’t that stifle competition? I understand that enforcement is hard as the rule wouldn’t be global, but still curious.
Antitrust law does exactly this. If Amazon owning EA overly concentrates market power/forms a monopoly, it'll be rejected and the deal with fail. Why would you want to put an upper cap on the size of companies? It feels like stifling innovation and productivity, which will be overly negative for everyone.
From a business perspective that might be partly true. But anti-trust / anti-competition policies are not just to provide a level playing ground for businesses but also consumers. A giant conglomerate might have a higher productivity, but that doesn't mean that benefit will be passed to the consumer unless they have rival businesses to compete with. Competition promotes more innovation and is more socially beneficial to both businesses and consumers than giant conglomerates that just become obese and unhealthy after a point.
Re: Amazon is not going to make a bid for Electronic Arts – sources
#76I sometimes wish Hacker News had emoticons, so I could add a sad face instead of just an upvote.
Re: Amazon is not going to make a bid for Electronic Arts – sources
#77Re: Amazon is not going to make a bid for Electronic Arts – sources
#78Will there ever be a point where as a society we agree to put an upper cap on the size of companies? Does Amazon really need to absorb even more? Doesn’t that stifle competition? I understand that enforcement is hard as the rule wouldn’t be global, but still curious.
Antitrust law does exactly this. If Amazon owning EA overly concentrates market power/forms a monopoly, it'll be rejected and the deal with fail. Why would you want to put an upper cap on the size of companies? It feels like stifling innovation and productivity, which will be overly negative for everyone.
Re: Amazon is not going to make a bid for Electronic Arts – sources
#79Yay even more monopolies in the gaming market.
Re: Amazon is not going to make a bid for Electronic Arts – sources
#801, Amazon runs the platform that sells the games - Amazon 2, Amazon runs the platform that people use while playing the games - Twitch 3, Amazon runs the platform that hosts the servers to play the games - AWS 4, Amazon runs the platform that you play the game on - Luna 5, Amazon runs the platform that creates the games - EA how is this not anti-competition for anyone running a company that competes in only one of th…