Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn

pornpen.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

131–140 of 1001 posts

Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn

#131

Post by throwawaysleep »

shortstuffsushi wrote: post #127
SCLeo wrote: post #104

In all seriousness, if the generated pictures are of better quality and is capable of generating porn that are tailored to my fetish, I am willing to pay $100 per month for the product. This is the future I am looking for, not the political correctness BS that other AI companies are pushing.

Maybe I'm being too close-minded, but paying $100/mo for porn seems absurd.

If you consume a lot of it, you want an endless supply of new stuff. It takes like 200 new pics for me to get off now. I can swipe decks and decks of the stuff.

Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn

#133

Post by [deleted] »

jancsika wrote: post #113
retrac wrote: post #56

I had some fun with StyleGAN a couple years ago. I should probably have written this up, or something. Some others I showed it too thought I should. But I never took it too serious. I was just bored over a couple weekends when I had access to some beefy GPUs. And y'know, it's quasi-porno. I opted for dudes not gals. Part personal preference, partly because I happened to get my hands on an enormous dataset of hot shir…

In your example link here: https://i.imgur.com/bS7ERC6.jpg you show one fellow with a smartphone stabbed through the chest, plus a headphone cord fused into his forearm veins. When you "let it churn away for a week," which of the following is more likely: 1. Smartphone Stab Wound Guys decrease in likelihood 2. More realistic-looking smartphone stabs In either case it doesn't exactly inspire confidence in self-driving…

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn

#134

Post by logisticseh »

kleer001 wrote: post #118

Looks more like "erotica" than "pornography" to me. More of a titillation (leaving something out) and appreciation of form than direct sexual stimulation by magnification of the actual act of sex (in all its various forms). But, yes, finally! I wonder why it took so long for someone to use these kinds of models to do the obvious. So is the nature of genius.

> But, yes, finally! I wonder why it took so long for someone to use these kinds of models to do the obvious.

Conjecture: most of the people with $15K home rigs and the know-how to do this also have a lot of earning power and professional status to lose by publicizing something like this. I'd bet it's been done hundreds or even thousands of times. Just not published.

Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn

#136

Post by tagami »

collegeburner wrote: post #93
thematrixturtle wrote: post #65

Inevitable successor to this: a TikTok-style adaptive porn feed that learns exactly what you like and starts generating porn customized to your kinks and preferences.

hmm yes that will definitely not totally fuck up the dopamine systems of young men and make an already badly addicted generation hopelessly dependent on this shit

/snark Welcome to the metaverse

Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn

#138

Post by superkuh »

collegeburner wrote: post #93
thematrixturtle wrote: post #65

Inevitable successor to this: a TikTok-style adaptive porn feed that learns exactly what you like and starts generating porn customized to your kinks and preferences.

hmm yes that will definitely not totally fuck up the dopamine systems of young men and make an already badly addicted generation hopelessly dependent on this shit

Porn "addiction" and all that hand wringing is just FUD from the moral panic types and the skeezy media "doctors" that prey on them. In fact non-substance "addictions" aren't recognized at all. "Gambling disorder" is presently the only condition in the subsection of "Non-substance-related disorders" in DSM 5.

Addiction mediated by chemicals that directly increase perceptions of incentive salience through mesolimbic dopaminergic activation are real addictions.

Perceptions of sensory stimuli come in through the normal paths do not directly hijack any part of the brain like addictive chemicals do. Downstream of the stimuli there may be reward learning but it's through normal channels, not directly turning up incentive salience. You actually have to like/enjoy something first before reward learning happens.

Post reply on HN