Unintentional The Exorcist Rule 34?
NSFW, obviously: https://pornpen.ai/view/27ylon4lGNpkfA4iJKJB
Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
91–100 of 1001 posts
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#92So, a few more years and no need for porn stars or the porn industry?
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#93Inevitable successor to this: a TikTok-style adaptive porn feed that learns exactly what you like and starts generating porn customized to your kinks and preferences.
hmm yes that will definitely not totally fuck up the dopamine systems of young men and make an already badly addicted generation hopelessly dependent on this shit
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#94Any plans to generate images of men?
that doesn't make sense in early iterations given how demand for this stuff skews
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#95So, a few more years and no need for porn stars or the porn industry?
I've been wondering about that. It seems clear to me that in general, human-made art will survive AI art, in part due to things like status and the need for connection to other people though art... But these things are absolutely not what people want for most sex content. In fact if you can be confident that there's no human behind some porn thing it might feel better and less shameful. Add to this that AI will be able to cater to people's preferences far better, and provide an even greater variety of content, and yeah I don't really see how the adult industry really survives outside of some niche cases.
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#96What if people use it to generate child porn?
Yes, this is a discussion forum, so while you're welcome to pose ethical questions, you should also feel free to weigh in on them too ;) It's a challenging question. Is it the mere fact of someone being aroused by children that makes child pornography offensive to society, or is it our belief that the creation of such materials necessary involves some degree of exploitation? If the latter, what about the well-documen…
being able to train a model to produce that shit implies a lot of input
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#97I had some fun with StyleGAN a couple years ago. I should probably have written this up, or something. Some others I showed it too thought I should. But I never took it too serious. I was just bored over a couple weekends when I had access to some beefy GPUs. And y'know, it's quasi-porno. I opted for dudes not gals. Part personal preference, partly because I happened to get my hands on an enormous dataset of hot shir…
Those first images remind me of the "brainlet" memes you often see in high-quality shitposts (something I appreciate more than the average HN reader I think).
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#98I had some fun with StyleGAN a couple years ago. I should probably have written this up, or something. Some others I showed it too thought I should. But I never took it too serious. I was just bored over a couple weekends when I had access to some beefy GPUs. And y'know, it's quasi-porno. I opted for dudes not gals. Part personal preference, partly because I happened to get my hands on an enormous dataset of hot shir…
This would make for a hilarious blog post
No post body was provided.
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#99It is great that you don't break the faces!
People are getting behind the idea of sabotaging AI to intentionally mess up faces, like whether DALL-E 2 was gimped in this way or not, other people believe it enough to do it in their own AI systems and I'm glad your doesn't do that
Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn
#100What if people use it to generate child porn?
Taking the comment in good faith as a more general philosophical question, I think it's quite interesting. From the fact that weaboos tend to claim their favorite lolis are 9000 year old dragons or whatever, I'm guessing it's already legally fraught to trade drawings of CP. I'm guessing AI generated images would fall in the same category, though where responsibility falls I'm not as clear on. The person who input in…
[deleted]