Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn

pornpen.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

81–90 of 1001 posts

Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn

#83

Post by [deleted] »

komali2 wrote: post #71
marcodiego wrote: post #55

What if people use it to generate child porn?

Taking the comment in good faith as a more general philosophical question, I think it's quite interesting. From the fact that weaboos tend to claim their favorite lolis are 9000 year old dragons or whatever, I'm guessing it's already legally fraught to trade drawings of CP. I'm guessing AI generated images would fall in the same category, though where responsibility falls I'm not as clear on. The person who input in…

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn

#84

Post by fire »

retrac wrote: post #56

I had some fun with StyleGAN a couple years ago. I should probably have written this up, or something. Some others I showed it too thought I should. But I never took it too serious. I was just bored over a couple weekends when I had access to some beefy GPUs. And y'know, it's quasi-porno. I opted for dudes not gals. Part personal preference, partly because I happened to get my hands on an enormous dataset of hot shir…

This would make for a hilarious blog post

Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn

#86

Post by WillPostForFood »

AussieWog93 wrote: post #54

Dear God, some of these things are horrifying, almost lovecraftian!

this one's gonna give me nightmares.

https://pornpen.ai/view/5fkq15n2JOmv3LoOkoWb

For those who don't want to click, two belly buttons, two nipple on one breast, dead black eyes, older head on younger body.

Re: Show HN: Pornpen.ai – AI-Generated Porn

#88

Post by braingenious »

kylebgorman wrote: post #80
marcodiego wrote: post #55

What if people use it to generate child porn?

Yes, this is a discussion forum, so while you're welcome to pose ethical questions, you should also feel free to weigh in on them too ;) It's a challenging question. Is it the mere fact of someone being aroused by children that makes child pornography offensive to society, or is it our belief that the creation of such materials necessary involves some degree of exploitation? If the latter, what about the well-documen…

>…If the latter, what about the well-documented risks of exploitation of consenting adult pornographic performers?

I’m not sure what you’re trying to get at here but your post kind of reads like “child sexual abuse material is equivalent to porn made by consenting adults.” Posing that as a philosophical “what if” and then moving on isn’t very different from just stating that as an opinion.

Post reply on HN