Live data from Hacker News

Design the next iPhone

neal.fun

251–260 of 363 posts

Re: Design the next iPhone

#251

I clicked present without adding anything, my design uses a telepathic interface, you simply think about it. If you see something, the image is transferred to the memory and uploaded to the cloud by simply desiring that occur. No microphone or earphones are needed, no Bluetooth. I call it the tiPhone it will be out in 2031, place your pre-orders now.

I know hn frowns on this type of comment but you really should have called he the psiPhone.

no, frown, me dumb. ELI5 it for me :)

Re: Design the next iPhone

#252

Missing: removable battery, USB-C port, microSD card slot, dual SIM card tray, speaker and microphone(s), ear proximity sensor and/or face scanner I’m assuming the home button can function as a rear fingerprint reader.

Granted. The internals now take up so much space only a 500mA battery can fit and the phone lasts 2 hours on a charge.

My Pinephone has all those features except the dual SIM card tray, and the battery’s capacity is rated 2,800mAh / typical 3,000mAh. The fact that it can burn through that in as little as an hour if held just right (with max brightness, volume, and load on the GPU, CPU, RAM, and separate modem CPU with the default nonfree, inefficient firmware; and not using the separately sold keyboard case with 6,000 more mAh) is a great incentive to limit its addictive effects.

Re: Design the next iPhone

#253
Unfortunately this does not have the option that I would like to see.

The perfect new Apple phone would be one that serves the cheap-ass bastard market or the market for people who aren't interested in carrying a computer in their pocket.

I present to you all the concept for a simple Apple flip phone (iFlipper). It does all the basic communications functions - text, HD single front and rear camera, voice calls and recording - has a long-life replaceable battery, basic keyboard, and a 2"x3" (50mm x 76 mm) HD screen. With this phone they could own the market for cheap, durable phones that can serve as company-issued phones for employees who need to stay connected but don't need to dink around with computing anything on their phones. Basic apps would allow time tracking, location tracking, text and pdf document reading and editing, simple spreadsheet creation and updating for customer invoicing, and note-taking and appointment management apps.

Some of that ends up sounding like a computer but compared to all the things you can do with a normal smart phone, we can dumb things down and still have great phones with broad market appeal.

You could even call them iDumb if you like.

Re: Design the next iPhone

#254

At first I thought this was kind of "meh" but then I clicked over on the "components" list at the bottom. Dear god, I just spent the last 5 minutes giggling and adding absurd things to the phone. I absolutely love this.

Yeah, I love how this silently escalates more and more.

Re: Design the next iPhone

#255

How fun! And did anyone else notice in the reflection of the metal band what room (like what virtual place the camera is located) you're shown designing this in?

If you want a slightly better look: https://neal.fun/design-the-next-iphone/cubemap/px.png

All sides: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32567147#32568060

Re: Design the next iPhone

#256

Unfortunately this does not have the option that I would like to see. The perfect new Apple phone would be one that serves the cheap-ass bastard market or the market for people who aren't interested in carrying a computer in their pocket. I present to you all the concept for a simple Apple flip phone (iFlipper). It does all the basic communications functions - text, HD single front and rear camera, voice calls and re…

That would not work for Apple because the iPhone is basically a vending machine in your pocket. Owned by Apple.

Re: Design the next iPhone

#258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Slap the lighting port in the middle of the screen, so you can't use it while charging.

The thing I thought was hilarious is that they put in a zillion funny gadgets, but you can't get a USB-C port instead of that godawful Lightning port.

Charging over hdmi is better anyway.

Re: Design the next iPhone

#259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Headphone jack at the top You're putting it in your pocket wrong.

Heh, I guess. My last two phones had the jack at the top, so it's instinctively where I put it. I do like being able to rest it on a surface while holding it vertically with an audio cable connected. But charging it at the same time from the other end is a little weird. I guess in an ideal world I'd put both ports at the top, but I don't think that's what you were going for :)

Top is the right place unless the fone flips itself. Or playing audio in a car is a pain.

Even keeping a phone charged in a car is annoying now.

Re: Design the next iPhone

#260
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They may also find another loophole: like make iPhone thinner than USB C, or certify it as a health tracker, or increase charging rate to 101 W. That technically moves iPhone into the laptop territory, and different regulations apply. "Included devices: a larger range of small and medium-sized devices with power delivery up to 100 watts would be included under the scope of the directive, including e-readers, low-powe…

There is no way Lightning can deliver 101W, so for that one they would need to change the port anyway.

Easy. Call it Lightning Pro, with chargers starting at $99. Not included in the box, but you don't need it anyway because they already give you magsafe
Post reply on HN