Live data from Hacker News

Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal on whistleblower story

twitter.com

31–40 of 91 posts

Re: Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal on whistleblower story

#31
post #28

Absolutely zero reason to say "who was terminated for ineffective leadership and poor performance". That context is not at all relevant to this matter and comes off as an attempt to distract from the subject in matter. And it doesn't bode well for employees to see their CEO mud slinging at former employees like that. You could be next! Besides, surely they know such messages eventually reach the public eye and give p…

From what I'm hearing, those who can leave Twitter are leaving twitter.

Re: Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal on whistleblower story

#32
post #28

Absolutely zero reason to say "who was terminated for ineffective leadership and poor performance". That context is not at all relevant to this matter and comes off as an attempt to distract from the subject in matter. And it doesn't bode well for employees to see their CEO mud slinging at former employees like that. You could be next! Besides, surely they know such messages eventually reach the public eye and give p…

Doesn't HR usually filter messages so as to leave no meat for any possible wrongful termination litigation or libelous tort?

Re: Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal on whistleblower story

#33
post #21

Is a CEO publicly accusing someone publicly of "ineffective leadership and poor performance" a libelous statement?

I'm sure there's lawyers somewhere willing to take the case, perhaps even pro bono, just for the publicity.

Discovery would be hilarious.

Re: Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal on whistleblower story

#34
post #21

Is a CEO publicly accusing someone publicly of "ineffective leadership and poor performance" a libelous statement?

If it's not true, it is libel or slander depending on how it was delivered.

It may be that Twitter's HR records say "fired for cause: ineffective leadership and poor performance" in which case the statement would be technically true.

It's much more likely that Twitter's HR records say something like "fired, not a good fit" in which case it's back to reputational harm.

Re: Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal on whistleblower story

#35
post #29

Lots of people are rushing to defend Mudge, and maybe it's warranted, but being an alumnus of cDc and l0pht doesn't make one a competent executive. It is possible for someone to be a great hacker but a mediocre manager. Twitter's taken a lot of body blows recently and Parag is obviously trying to motivate his people. He's not necessarily lying even if it's a rather unprofessional way to speak I'll of someone who's be…

> Lots of people are rushing to defend Mudge, and maybe it's warranted, but being an alumnus of cDc and l0pht doesn't make one a competent executive.

He was also a DARPA PM, which definitely requires management/executive skills.

Re: Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal on whistleblower story

#36
> "given Mudge was accountable for many aspects of this work that he is now inaccurately portraying"

Is he not shooting himself in the foot here? This makes it look more like they got rid of him for trying to do his job accurately and was annoying everyone with all of these "security problems."

Re: Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal on whistleblower story

#37
post #29

Lots of people are rushing to defend Mudge, and maybe it's warranted, but being an alumnus of cDc and l0pht doesn't make one a competent executive. It is possible for someone to be a great hacker but a mediocre manager. Twitter's taken a lot of body blows recently and Parag is obviously trying to motivate his people. He's not necessarily lying even if it's a rather unprofessional way to speak I'll of someone who's be…

He might not have gotten the memo CIO role is about signing contracts with paper compliance vendors instead of actually securing shit.

Re: Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal on whistleblower story

#38
post #32
post #28

Absolutely zero reason to say "who was terminated for ineffective leadership and poor performance". That context is not at all relevant to this matter and comes off as an attempt to distract from the subject in matter. And it doesn't bode well for employees to see their CEO mud slinging at former employees like that. You could be next! Besides, surely they know such messages eventually reach the public eye and give p…

Doesn't HR usually filter messages so as to leave no meat for any possible wrongful termination litigation or libelous tort?

Yeah, but Mudge already sent a "whistleblower" complaint to congress / FTC so this isn't your standard publicly-amicable executive departure.

Re: Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal on whistleblower story

#39
post #16

On the one hand we have a legend with impressive track record that is trying to bring to light serious issues at a large company and he has not much to gain but a lot to lose by making false accusations. On the other hand we have the Twitter CEO who does not have any comparable track record and has all to gain by trying to deflect and a lot to lose by admiting that the company under him has serious issues. He does ha…

Just curious: why is FB evil but TWTR isn't? They both seem to share similar social media posts and both seem to apply quite a bit of censorship at times.

Re: Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal on whistleblower story

#40
post #16

On the one hand we have a legend with impressive track record that is trying to bring to light serious issues at a large company and he has not much to gain but a lot to lose by making false accusations. On the other hand we have the Twitter CEO who does not have any comparable track record and has all to gain by trying to deflect and a lot to lose by admiting that the company under him has serious issues. He does ha…

[dead]
Post reply on HN