Live data from Hacker News

An odd discovery on Spotify

robinsloan.com

191–200 of 442 posts

Re: An odd discovery on Spotify

#191
post #118

The songs in the playlist are the first 4 chords of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pachelbel's_Canon essentially looped for 47 seconds. I V vi iii appears very frequently in pop music https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pidokakU4I . If one were trying to exploit the algorithm...

I listened to Romilda Gebbia if that was what you were refering to, and to me it sounds like I V vi IV.

Re: An odd discovery on Spotify

#192
post #28

People have been noticing this a lot recently but what nobody seems to know is that this is a form of money laundering/“scamming.” I know because I used to be active on crime forums and talked to some of the people who engineered this scheme. People will set up fake Spotify artist accounts with stolen identities and bank accounts, pay a musician for songs that pass as music, and then bot millions of streams on them.…

Very likely that the "musicians" that create those "music" are actually AIs.

Re: An odd discovery on Spotify

#193
post #157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, they have been aware of it for a long time. https://blog.echonest.com/post/48943428838/how-we-cope-with-... Spotify is actually half-decent here. The other streaming services seem to mainly compete on cutting costs, and many are little more than frontends over 7digital's services (who, surprise, also do virtually nothing to prevent spam). To take an example: https://www.deezer.com/search/%22From%20the%20box%22/al…

I guess Apple have some sort of curation, or maybe don't use 7digital at all, because Apple Music shows no results for "From the box".

Yeah. I haven't used them, but Apple Music too seems to have blocked this spammer. Google (YouTube music now) too.

Tidal still has him, though: https://tidal.com/browse/album/241125359

Re: An odd discovery on Spotify

#194
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Happens to me a lot on Youtube too - you watch just one thing - and now your recommendations are full of things like that one thing. Spotify's recommendation system is much better than youtube's (at least for me). I frequently "joke" that it is one of the few applications of ML that actively make my life as a consumer better. Having been following Spotify's "Discover Weekly" for several years now, I'm actually real…

As a father of a young child, Spotify's algo's are completely useless to me. If their ML is so smart it should be able to determine that Row row row your boat doesn't mix well with Anthrax. Wish I'd be able to toggle 'don't recommend kids music' somewhere.

I used Spotify to play music at a children's party. I am still getting recommendations for "Happy Birthday" months later. According to Spotify, it goes very well with Sheryl Crow and R.E.M.

Re: An odd discovery on Spotify

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Happens to me a lot on Youtube too - you watch just one thing - and now your recommendations are full of things like that one thing. Spotify's recommendation system is much better than youtube's (at least for me). I frequently "joke" that it is one of the few applications of ML that actively make my life as a consumer better. Having been following Spotify's "Discover Weekly" for several years now, I'm actually real…

> Spotify's recommendation system is much better than youtube's (at least for me). I frequently "joke" that it is one of the few applications of ML that actively make my life as a consumer better. I've had the opposite experience with Spotify - I'd say my discovery of new music has withered to almost nil since switching when Google Music shifted to YouTube. The algorithm just churns stuff I've already listened to, or…

True, but it makes for another good use: building a live playlist. Youtube would cram all random things with the couple of novel interesting clips, while Spotify will keep the mood until I decide to switch.

Re: An odd discovery on Spotify

#196
post #176
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a father of a young child, Spotify's algo's are completely useless to me. If their ML is so smart it should be able to determine that Row row row your boat doesn't mix well with Anthrax. Wish I'd be able to toggle 'don't recommend kids music' somewhere.

I agree. There are some playlists and songs I only listen to in the gym, and similar songs constantly float to the top of Spotify's recommendations for me due to gym being 3x week. I did consider creating another "gym-only" user on our Family plan, but Spotify should really have a way to create named contexts for the one user. e.g. commute, gym, run, working from home, on a plane, etc.

Pandora does this with 'stations'.

Re: An odd discovery on Spotify

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Happens to me a lot on Youtube too - you watch just one thing - and now your recommendations are full of things like that one thing. Spotify's recommendation system is much better than youtube's (at least for me). I frequently "joke" that it is one of the few applications of ML that actively make my life as a consumer better. Having been following Spotify's "Discover Weekly" for several years now, I'm actually real…

Spotify's algorithm works really well until you let someone else use the account. I wish there was a "child mode", "party mode" or whatever to disable updating recommendations.

Pandora gives people granular access to the songs that are being used as the basis for recommendations. You would just delete the songs used by guests.

Re: An odd discovery on Spotify

#198
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Happens to me a lot on Youtube too - you watch just one thing - and now your recommendations are full of things like that one thing. Spotify's recommendation system is much better than youtube's (at least for me). I frequently "joke" that it is one of the few applications of ML that actively make my life as a consumer better. Having been following Spotify's "Discover Weekly" for several years now, I'm actually real…

As a father of a young child, Spotify's algo's are completely useless to me. If their ML is so smart it should be able to determine that Row row row your boat doesn't mix well with Anthrax. Wish I'd be able to toggle 'don't recommend kids music' somewhere.

You can turn off monitoring what you listen to for recommendations by launching a "Private session" in the app

Re: An odd discovery on Spotify

#199
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They should (and probably do, behind the scenes) have separate data fields for composer and performer. At least, I believe that labels will input those separately for each track, to enable correct tracking of compensation. Then Spotify will lump them together into “artist” n the UI, I assume. To make it easier for a casual user to find what they want. The “performer” Fanny Mendelssohn should probably not be confused…

I like how you think labels correctly label anything. I happen to work at a music streaming service (not Spotify) and I can definitely say that those datasets are insanely noisy and generally you can't really trust labels to, well, label their data correctly for anything.

One track I bought on iTunes had credits for both "Bob Dylan" and "B. Dylan" on the same song, or something very similar like that.

Re: An odd discovery on Spotify

#200
post #28

People have been noticing this a lot recently but what nobody seems to know is that this is a form of money laundering/“scamming.” I know because I used to be active on crime forums and talked to some of the people who engineered this scheme. People will set up fake Spotify artist accounts with stolen identities and bank accounts, pay a musician for songs that pass as music, and then bot millions of streams on them.…

That's really interesting - although when I read that story I thought the point was the broken recommendation system. Happens to me a lot on Youtube too - you watch just one thing - and now your recommendations are full of things like that one thing . Or Facebook/Youtube, somehow: I watched a single video on Youtube about Viking sword fighting and suddenly my people recommendations on Facebook were at least 20% milit…

Something I noticed after I watched an episode of Stoic Finance[1] about a possible "impending crash of the Chinese economy" is that YouTube started recommending about a dozen "independent" channels.

I put the word independent in air quotes because they all have near-identical looking title cards with the similar fonts, some variant of the phrasing "The collapse has begun!", and the same-ish content. Different presenters, different channels, same message. Over and over. And over.

Reminds me of the "This is Extremely Dangerous to Our Democracy" clip that edited together dozens of apparently independent local news channels saying the same script, verbatim.[2]

You've got to wonder if there's someone with deep pockets trying to influence public opinion on China? Or is it just the same thing as the "local" news channels, where a bunch of YouTubers have been "bought" by a corporation that send them material to read?

I would love to know if anyone on Hacker News knows something about this kind of thing...

[1] In case you're interested: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=stoic+finance

...and some copy-cats clips I recommend opening in a private tab unless you want to be inundated with even more clones:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6slQLbT_fNY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-tLenP5NA4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDVNag9Pq7s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JEdz1eA2vQ

[2] Entertaining and terrifying: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZggCipbiHwE

Post reply on HN