Google Timer is back
61–70 of 99 posts
Re: Google Timer is back
#62El low hanging fruit.
Re: Google Timer is back
#63Here's a timer for when they'll shut it down again https://www.google.com/search?q=timer+2+weeks
Re: Google Timer is back
#64https://twitter.com/dannysullivan/status/1560010093294489602
Re: Google Timer is back
#65For timing a meeting, try http://timeit.lol/ — it shows you an estimate of when your meeting will end, which will creep forward if you exceed the time allotted for the current agenda item. It was designed for standups, where each person gets 5 minutes to speak, but you can also add agenda items of varying length. You can also use it in count-up mode ( http://timeit.lol/?0 ) to count how much time each person has spok…
Re: Google Timer is back
#66How are people supposed to use features like this if they get dropped and re-added from time to time? If I want a convenient timer, googling "set 5 minute timer" has no advantage if I don't know whether it will work or not. Inconsistency is an enemy of convenience.
Re: Google Timer is back
#67How are people supposed to use features like this if they get dropped and re-added from time to time? If I want a convenient timer, googling "set 5 minute timer" has no advantage if I don't know whether it will work or not. Inconsistency is an enemy of convenience.
Re: Google Timer is back
#68Holding out for Reader ;)
Re: Google Timer is back
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your software never has bugs? We definitely had to turn something off before because something didn't line up/someone messed up planning during a bigger tech transition. This stuff happens in big orgs ran by humans, I'm happy that it's back and it's a lot better than the first result in any case.
I know that software is fiendishly difficult, but if you think a parent is ever going to put their child in a software driven car, then the industry had probably better get a bit more serious.
Re: Google Timer is back
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
A bug is a bug. "Why would anyone ever do XYZ" is a separate discussion. And if you write software for a living you know that there is always that one user who will do exactly XYZ.
Nope. Undefined behavior on obviously incorrect input isn't a bug in my world. ( might be in other circumstances )