Live data from Hacker News

The downfall of smart TVs: From promises of seamless viewing to ad tool

adguard.com

351–360 of 579 posts

Re: The downfall of smart TVs: From promises of seamless viewing to ad tool

#353

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or just get any smart tv and add a android tv dongle . They don't cost much

If you care about privacy absolutely do not get an Android TV dongle. Get an Apple TV (though yes, they cost more. Maybe find a used one on eBay if you're particularly price sensitive)

Now let me just open an ADB bridge with my Apple TV and install some third party applications, maybe flash a custom OS, rollback to an older firmware.

Re: The downfall of smart TVs: From promises of seamless viewing to ad tool

#354
post #280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not necessarily - it's what the market will bear, not the cost itself. This just means the target market will tolerate the ads, not that they are subsidizing the cost of the TV. The extra revenue could just as easily be gravy - especially because this is probably the result of some implicit collusion.

This is my expectation of the market, based on at least the following two points: 1) Video games are sold at full price and still include ads and microtransactions 2) Cable TV was originally ad free (and marketed as such), until they realized they could include ads and make even more money. I hold the opinion that executives at many of these companies hold the view, "Why only get some of our customer's money when we…

[flagged]

Re: The downfall of smart TVs: From promises of seamless viewing to ad tool

#355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Legal != moral.

So yes it’s your “moral right” to obtain content without paying for it because you don’t want ads. Would you feel the same way if a commercial entity violated the GPL?

Is it a "moral right" for companies to use intellectual property laws to force your children to watch ads? Children are legally unable to participate in contracts, should they be allowed to watch any media, with binding licenses and laws, at all?

Re: The downfall of smart TVs: From promises of seamless viewing to ad tool

#356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you block internet if it will join open networks automatically?

But will it join open networks automatically? It is of course entirely possible, technically speaking, but would get any company actually doing that in a lot of trouble in most developed countries.

> but would get any company actually doing that in a lot of trouble in most developed countries.

Why then is Amazon building out its parasitic WiFi network, if not to give unmediated access to its devices. I bet Amazon FireOS devices will do this very thing in the next 2 years, and not get into any trouble for it in the US

Re: The downfall of smart TVs: From promises of seamless viewing to ad tool

#357
post #340
post #87

FWIW, it is still possible to get TVs without this stuff, albeit at a premium. TVs are still made for business usage in areas like conference rooms, wall displays etc. They're often found under labeling like "commercial digital signage" or "business display" or the like, they seem to often try to avoid using "TV" (if being cynical maybe to make them harder for normal people to discover and confuse them if they do). B…

Which brands of smart TV show ads? I live in the UK and I've had three different brands of smart TV (Philips, Samsung and Toshiba) and my experience with all of them has been pretty good. Netflix, YouTube, etc. have worked pretty well and I haven't seen any ads that weren't linked to the apps themselves. Perhaps they're tracking me in ways I don't know about, though?

I bought my mother a Sony TV which displays an iPlayer notification on every tv show on any BBC channel.

"Press Green to see the show from the beginning on iPlayer"

You can't turn it off and will only go away if you remove iPlayer. While it's not an advert, it's still annoying spyware.

Re: The downfall of smart TVs: From promises of seamless viewing to ad tool

#358

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.investors.com/news/disney-earnings-disney-stock/ > The Dow giant still expects Disney+ to be profitable in 2024. Disney+ isn’t profitable once you take into account “transfer payments”. They may not be profitable at all yet. But they specifically mentioned being profitable including transfer payments. That basically means that when Disney movie studios use to sell streaming rights to another company - say…

That's text-book financial engineering. I understand the creators' concerns, especially the ones that signed contracts before Disney decided to create Disney+, but on the Disney side I really don't care. It's more, I'm explicitly hostile to it due to the balkanization of streaming platforms now that every big producers start to have their own end-user distribution, subscription-based service.

It’s not “financial engineering”. It’s standard managerial accounting. I’m an MBA drop out and studied this over 20 years ago (undergrad in CS. The dot com boom called my name). In most large organization, different departments are separated into “cost centers”. Managers are often responsible for their own profit and loss. Internal “costs” are assigned to departments working together.

Why should the Disney+ manager get credit for making $450 million in profit by causing Disney Movie Studios to lose $500 million? How is that good for the overall business? Again I’m completely making up numbers.

We had a method to pay one bill and get all of the content you wanted - it was called “cable”.

Re: The downfall of smart TVs: From promises of seamless viewing to ad tool

#359
post #60

Another case in point: my TCL series 5 has made 11K (!!!) DNS requests for scribe.logs.roku.com, just last month. As a matter of fact, it's now the top-blocked domain in my pi-hole. It's a shame Roku won't allow you to at least opt-out of telemetry.

11k blocked requests for that domain in a month? Seems low... My pi-hole is blocking that domain about 50k times A DAY. All from one TCL TV.

Re: The downfall of smart TVs: From promises of seamless viewing to ad tool

#360
post #53

At home, I've never connected my TV to my network. The few firmware updates I've needed to do were applied using a thumb drive, and I use an AppleTV as my interface. When I travel, I bring along an AppleTV and plug the HDMI port into their set. This lets me keep the services I subscribe-to and use them with their display. This has worked great until my most-recent rental, which had a RokuTV -- presumably setup on Wif…

I love my ATV 4K. But it’s useless for traveling since hotels require you to login and the AppleTV doesn’t have a browser. The Roku sticks get around this by temporarily exposing a pass through wifi connection that you can connect to from your phone/computer and log in to your hotel’s wifi. The only work around with the AppleTV is to buy a second travel router.

I have a spare AppleTV for travelling and have never had a problem connecting it, even before tvOS 15.4. The router suggestions are also overcomplicating it. Just connect your phone to the WiFi, then choose the same network on the AppleTV and stand near it - a sheet pops up on your phone asking if you want to share the password with the AppleTV.
Post reply on HN