Experts troubled by Canada’s euthanasia laws
51–60 of 247 posts
Re: Experts troubled by Canada’s euthanasia laws
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Percentage of people that plan to kill themselves, but simply fail to do so because something minor happens to interfere is not small; as in they do not end up committing suicide and never try again. If someone really wants to kill themselves, no reason to make it easy, it should by definition be hard to do, since there is no undoing it.
How does an old man in a wheelchair kill himself? Why should it be so hard for him? What if he fails? He gets to live even longer in more anguish and humiliation?
Why is that?
Re: Experts troubled by Canada’s euthanasia laws
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Percentage of people that plan to kill themselves, but simply fail to do so because something minor happens to interfere is not small; as in they do not end up committing suicide and never try again. If someone really wants to kill themselves, no reason to make it easy, it should by definition be hard to do, since there is no undoing it.
How does an old man in a wheelchair kill himself? Why should it be so hard for him? What if he fails? He gets to live even longer in more anguish and humiliation?
Re: Experts troubled by Canada’s euthanasia laws
#54> The law was later amended to allow people who are not terminally ill to choose death, significantly broadening the number of eligible people. Critics say that change removed a key safeguard aimed at protecting people with potentially years or decades of life left. Here's the thing. If I want to die at 80 because I don't want to live past that point, that is my choice. Even if I have no "illness". If I don't want to…
>If I want to die at 80 because I don't want to live past that point, that is my choice. I think most reasonable people can agree with this. It gets more complicated when its a depressed 20 year old saying it.
Re: Experts troubled by Canada’s euthanasia laws
#55> Canada’s road to allowing euthanasia began in 2015, when its highest court declared that outlawing assisted suicide deprived people of their dignity and autonomy. It gave national leaders a year to draft legislation.
Who cares what experts think about what’s fundamentally the regulation of morality?
Re: Experts troubled by Canada’s euthanasia laws
#56> The law was later amended to allow people who are not terminally ill to choose death, significantly broadening the number of eligible people. Critics say that change removed a key safeguard aimed at protecting people with potentially years or decades of life left. Here's the thing. If I want to die at 80 because I don't want to live past that point, that is my choice. Even if I have no "illness". If I don't want to…
I support people being able to have autonomy over their lives (and their deaths). But, as you say, we need to eliminate effective coercion and this has a lot of implications.
For example, no one should ever feel that this is a way out of crippling medical debt or debt they may leave to their family.
So if you think about it, legalizing euthanasia is essentially predicated on having an adequate social safety net, access to mental health resources and access to health care, all of which I support.
Re: Experts troubled by Canada’s euthanasia laws
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe it's just me, but if a stranger can talk you into killing yourself - what the fuck else can a stranger talk you into doing? Maybe people need to take some responsibility, instead of arguing the existence of Dr Evils in medicine.
You’ve heard of the Milgram experiment? It specifically focused on medical authority.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/the-shocking-truth-of-...
Re: Experts troubled by Canada’s euthanasia laws
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could you give other examples? It seems to me that the balance between individual freedom and restrictions is pretty good in most western countries (I don't know much about other continents).
Conscription...done.
Re: Experts troubled by Canada’s euthanasia laws
#59> The law was later amended to allow people who are not terminally ill to choose death, significantly broadening the number of eligible people. Critics say that change removed a key safeguard aimed at protecting people with potentially years or decades of life left. Here's the thing. If I want to die at 80 because I don't want to live past that point, that is my choice. Even if I have no "illness". If I don't want to…
I hope 80 doesn’t look like that for most people. Even aging rock stars are still moving at 80: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mick_Jagger https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_McCartney Willie Nelson is almost 90 and still touring: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willie_Nelson