I am not saying the intention here is the same, but the headline doesn't inspire confidence. There's something incredibly creepy and immoral about the rush to create then commercialise sentient beings. Let's not beat about the bush - we are basically talking slavery. Every "ethical" discussion on the matter has been about protecting humans, and none of it about protecting the beings we are in a rush to bring into lif…
John Carmack's new AGI company, Keen Technologies, has raised a $20M round
101–110 of 643 posts
Re: John Carmack's new AGI company, Keen Technologies, has raised a $20M round
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
They briefly considered the name "Doom technologies" before settling on Keen.
Guess the former wouldn't work very well for PR.
The friend moved out at some point. A year later, his cousin became rather concerned when he suddenly started receiving mail from the California Secretary of State that was addressed to The Legion of Doom.
Re: John Carmack's new AGI company, Keen Technologies, has raised a $20M round
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
You have some catching up to do. Consensus is dropping to this lifetime for sure, if not this decade.
what consensus? i think most researchers remain skeptical
Re: John Carmack's new AGI company, Keen Technologies, has raised a $20M round
#104I am not saying the intention here is the same, but the headline doesn't inspire confidence. There's something incredibly creepy and immoral about the rush to create then commercialise sentient beings. Let's not beat about the bush - we are basically talking slavery. Every "ethical" discussion on the matter has been about protecting humans, and none of it about protecting the beings we are in a rush to bring into lif…
Re: John Carmack's new AGI company, Keen Technologies, has raised a $20M round
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is human-experience changing stuff. that's one way of putting it it will remove the need for the vast majority of the population, which will end extremely badly
But by the same token, there's no need for billions of humans now. AGI isn't really going to change that except for making work even more superfluous than it already is.
With AGI that is no longer true, they can just replace most people with computers and automated combat drones while they keep a small number of personal servants to look after them. Currently most jobs either is there to support other humans or can be replaced by a computer, remove the need for humans and all of those jobs just disappear and leaders no longer care about having lots of people around.
Re: John Carmack's new AGI company, Keen Technologies, has raised a $20M round
#106"AGI"?
Artificial General Intelligence. Machines as smart and capable of thought as we are and eventually smarter.
This is perhaps an end goal of AGI, but not a definition of AGI. A relatively dumb AGI is how it will start, but it will still be an AGI.
Re: John Carmack's new AGI company, Keen Technologies, has raised a $20M round
#107I am not saying the intention here is the same, but the headline doesn't inspire confidence. There's something incredibly creepy and immoral about the rush to create then commercialise sentient beings. Let's not beat about the bush - we are basically talking slavery. Every "ethical" discussion on the matter has been about protecting humans, and none of it about protecting the beings we are in a rush to bring into lif…
Re: John Carmack's new AGI company, Keen Technologies, has raised a $20M round
#108I am not saying the intention here is the same, but the headline doesn't inspire confidence. There's something incredibly creepy and immoral about the rush to create then commercialise sentient beings. Let's not beat about the bush - we are basically talking slavery. Every "ethical" discussion on the matter has been about protecting humans, and none of it about protecting the beings we are in a rush to bring into lif…
Re: John Carmack's new AGI company, Keen Technologies, has raised a $20M round
#109Re: John Carmack's new AGI company, Keen Technologies, has raised a $20M round
#110I am not saying the intention here is the same, but the headline doesn't inspire confidence. There's something incredibly creepy and immoral about the rush to create then commercialise sentient beings. Let's not beat about the bush - we are basically talking slavery. Every "ethical" discussion on the matter has been about protecting humans, and none of it about protecting the beings we are in a rush to bring into lif…