Live data from Hacker News

Metal Archives 20th Anniversary

metal-archives.com

31–40 of 65 posts

Re: Metal Archives 20th Anniversary

#31

Argh! No Pirate Metal category? They categorize them generically as Folk Metal but have a separate Viking Metal category.

They do? I see Folk/Pagan/Viking as one genre when I browse by genre. Alsetorm (sorry, don't know of any other pirate themed bands) has some folk elements so I think it fits.

Re: Metal Archives 20th Anniversary

#32
post #26

Argh! No Pirate Metal category? They categorize them generically as Folk Metal but have a separate Viking Metal category.

Pirate metal is probably seen as "ironic," or maybe just too niche to deserve a top level genre (how many bands besides Alestorm are there?). Viking metal has a long history, though, given the Nordic roots of many extreme metal genres. That being said, I don't think Viking Metal is too helpful of a genre anyway given the completely different sound of, say, Ensiferum vs Borknagar, or Tyr vs Windir.

Running Wild was the first to make pirate themed power / speed metal

Re: Metal Archives 20th Anniversary

#33

Argh! No Pirate Metal category? They categorize them generically as Folk Metal but have a separate Viking Metal category.

Everyone's mentioning Alestorm - where's the love for Visions of Atlantis? It's not even ironically good, it's just good.

Re: Metal Archives 20th Anniversary

#34
post #7
post #2

If there is anything like the Metal Archives for electronic music or rock music (actually any genre) out there, I'd like to know about it. It's simply the greatest music encyclopedia I've come across, albeit entirely focused on metal. As much as I appreciate Discogs and RateYourMusic, they tackle different things and don't really function as encyclopedias, the former functioning more as a catalogue and the latter as…

There’s https://www.progarchives.com for progressive rock and related genres.

Indeed, this has become pretty much the authoritative source for prog rock information. It seems to be what everyone refers to from all the online communities like reddit.

Re: Metal Archives 20th Anniversary

#35
post #8
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There may not be. There seems to be something obsessive about metal fans to catalog and classify and document. I mean, look at the wiki page on subgenres: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_genres It fills me with awe and giggles.

I’m not sure what you’re talking about but excuse me while I turn on some female-fronted symphonic power metal.

I prefer my female-fronted metal to be "glam", not the inferior "symphonic power". I actually owned a couple of her LPs in the '80s:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lita_Ford

Since our tastes are so far apart, I guess we have nothing else to talk about.

Re: Metal Archives 20th Anniversary

#36
post #4
post #2

If there is anything like the Metal Archives for electronic music or rock music (actually any genre) out there, I'd like to know about it. It's simply the greatest music encyclopedia I've come across, albeit entirely focused on metal. As much as I appreciate Discogs and RateYourMusic, they tackle different things and don't really function as encyclopedias, the former functioning more as a catalogue and the latter as…

There may not be. There seems to be something obsessive about metal fans to catalog and classify and document. I mean, look at the wiki page on subgenres: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_genres It fills me with awe and giggles.

Musical genre multiplication and creation is just an internet disease where a bunch of would-be critics put original research on wikipedia and retroactively justify it by referencing one sentence in a 10 year old Slate article by some actual critic of no particular note.

Most of the people included in these genres had no idea they were in them when they created the music (because they didn't exist.) Plenty of them still have no idea, and may not have ever heard of the genre that they "typified."

edit: and since most people who are "experts" on popular music create that identity by just vacuuming up what they can find on the internet, creating a genre in Wikipedia becomes equivalent to creating a genre.

Re: Metal Archives 20th Anniversary

#39
post #11
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There may not be. There seems to be something obsessive about metal fans to catalog and classify and document. I mean, look at the wiki page on subgenres: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_genres It fills me with awe and giggles.

I wouldn't take that list too seriously. Metal-archives genres tend to not delve into "styles" as much. But there are certainly many distinct sub-genres and one can't exactly argue that Black Sabbath, Dimmu Borgir and Cannibal Corpse sound similar. I agree that the community itself takes the genre thing way too far and it often ends up being pretty funny. Then again, electronic music probably gives metal a run for it…

Lemme give it a shot:

Cookie Monster (includes Black Metal)

Hardcore (see Pantera)

Metal (see Metallica)

Crap (see Poison)

Re: Metal Archives 20th Anniversary

#40
post #16

MA, as well as several metal forums I've been a part of, have stayed shockingly consistent over the years. It's really neat to me. There's drama in every corner of the internet, but I've always enjoyed my metal spaces.

Consistency: If it's not on MA then it's usually not something I want to listen to. Too easy.
Post reply on HN