Ford F-150 Lightning: Fast Truck, Slow Computer
theverge.com
Ford F-150 Lightning: Fast Truck, Slow Computer
1–10 of 570 posts
Re: Ford F-150 Lightning: Fast Truck, Slow Computer
#2Re: Ford F-150 Lightning: Fast Truck, Slow Computer
#3They strapped on an Android tablet and called it a day. From my experience (ex-mobile game dev, Medical SaaS), Android tablets are very slow. We encourage our customers to not buy Android tablets because the patient experience is not the greatest.
Re: Ford F-150 Lightning: Fast Truck, Slow Computer
#4They strapped on an Android tablet and called it a day. From my experience (ex-mobile game dev, Medical SaaS), Android tablets are very slow. We encourage our customers to not buy Android tablets because the patient experience is not the greatest.
Re: Ford F-150 Lightning: Fast Truck, Slow Computer
#5The only thing I may dislike is not having physical buttons/dials for climate.
Re: Ford F-150 Lightning: Fast Truck, Slow Computer
#6Does it do CarPlay/Android Auto? If that's the case, I honestly don't really care how fast it is - I have an older EV with Sync3 and it's fine (more than fine, I just use my smartphone for most interactions using CarPlay). The only thing I may dislike is not having physical buttons/dials for climate.
There’s a quick action button to navigate back home on the map widget, but it just opens the map app full-screen, defeating the purpose of the widget entirely. I’d love to have CarPlay open to handle my phone and messaging alongside the radio, but that’s not possible, even though the display is clearly big enough to show both at once.
All of that is made worse by how slow everything is. Switching between the radio and the map or the map and CarPlay is… slow. Swiping along the cards is pretty slow. The display can be responsive, and the games are certainly playable, but in most instances, it’s just slow.
This is the point in any car review where many people are already drafting emails to me about just using CarPlay or Android Auto instead of the stock software, but friends, CarPlay and Android Auto are not good at helping EV owners navigate charging. If you want to plot out a route with accurate range estimates and an effective charging strategy, you have to use the built-in nav — especially since Ford has taken the time to organize charging stations by speed, and seeking out 150kW fast chargers is an important part of the Lightning experience because the battery is so big. Apple and Google are a long way behind on this front.Re: Ford F-150 Lightning: Fast Truck, Slow Computer
#7Re: Ford F-150 Lightning: Fast Truck, Slow Computer
#8This seems far less confusing than the Autopilot and FSD bifurcation that Tesla has.
It beeps at you to get your hands on the wheel when you're trying to autosteer in places it's not allowed. Sounds reasonable, no?
Re: Ford F-150 Lightning: Fast Truck, Slow Computer
#9> Ford’s entire suite of driver-assistance tech is called “BlueCruise,” which is deeply confusing because it means that everything from boring old cruise control to full-on hands-free driving is technically “BlueCruise.” This seems far less confusing than the Autopilot and FSD bifurcation that Tesla has. It beeps at you to get your hands on the wheel when you're trying to autosteer in places it's not allowed. Sounds…
Re: Ford F-150 Lightning: Fast Truck, Slow Computer
#10It's incredibly frustrating to me that buying a vehicle with a pushbutton, working, reliable interface is becoming increasingly impossible to do. Why is UX so horrifically bad in the vehicle space? Is it poor management decisions or a shortage of good UX engineers? I get that lumping everything into the touchscreen can be a cheaper option to build, but I'd GLADLY pay for a different option. I don't understand it.