Live data from Hacker News

One dead and nine wounded after accident with self-driving car

spiegel.de

21–30 of 99 posts

Re: One dead and nine wounded after accident with self-driving car

#21
BMW has denied that it was an autonomous / self-driving test-car [1].

The article is from Reutlinger Generalanzeiger, a regional newspaper, and they probably have better sources than Der Spiegel.

The B28 is a very scenic drive, the region is also not a densely populated area. I used to live close by.

[1]: https://www.gea.de/blaulicht_artikel,-schwerer-crashnahe-zai...

Re: One dead and nine wounded after accident with self-driving car

#22
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

According to the articke, autonomous car (unclear so far if manually controlled at the time of the accident or not at the moment) hit car A (old lady), car A subsequently hit car B, car B went of the road, hit a tree and caught fire. After hitting car A, the autonomous car hit car C head on (I assume that's what you see in the picture), driver of car C died (no surpise whej looking at the picture). Pretty fucked up,…

> autonomous car (unclear so far if manually controlled at the time of the accident or not at the moment) More evidence that testing this stuff on the public roads, backup driver or not, is dangerous.

Driving in general is inherently dangerous. For an informed opinion on the matter, we need crash rates per driven distance with and without autonomous driving activated. Preferably by manufacturer.

Re: One dead and nine wounded after accident with self-driving car

#23
post #19

Serious question: will we demand perfection from autonomous cars before we allow them out of “test” status? How many autonomous miles without an accident will be sufficient to prove safety? I am not diminishing this tragedy; I can only imagine the grief of the families involved and my heart goes out to them. I am also NOT making the “have to break a few eggs to make an omelette“ argument; clearly something went wrong…

As you may have unintentionally alluded too with your reference to Concorde, there is no hard number or line. It's purely a public perception thing. There is no definable threshold that is "good enough".

The tech needs to stick around long enough and proliferate to a large enough cross section of society to become mundane (something Concorde failed to do). The people who are not satisfied will never be satisfied by an improvement in the numbers. What will change their minds is when it becomes clear that nobody else cares and they're just yelling at clouds. Realistically what that means is a generation has to come of age after the tech has proliferated and accept it by default and don't see it as pushing the limits of what's reasonable. From there the acceptance gets back-ported.

Re: One dead and nine wounded after accident with self-driving car

#24
post #21

BMW has denied that it was an autonomous / self-driving test-car [1]. The article is from Reutlinger Generalanzeiger, a regional newspaper, and they probably have better sources than Der Spiegel. The B28 is a very scenic drive, the region is also not a densely populated area. I used to live close by. [1]: https://www.gea.de/blaulicht_artikel,-schwerer-crashnahe-zai...

A sticker on the vehicle clearly shows it was BMW autonomous test vehicle: https://twitter.com/AEONde/status/1559477911446589441

Re: One dead and nine wounded after accident with self-driving car

#25
post #3

The phrasing in the article is a bit confusing if it's actually established that it was running autonomously or not. (other articles suggest that's currently unclear/hasn't been announced)

The article calls it an E-test car but it also says it had the 43 year old driver and 4 passengers(aged 31, 47, 42 and a baby). Is it a test car, which I'd expect would just have 1 or 2 employees monitoring everything, or a car being used by civilians? If you zoom in the picture, the logo on the center of the car's rim is BMW's logo...

Most likely an employee, using the car privately. It was at 17:00, with a baby on-board. Does not seem to working.

Re: One dead and nine wounded after accident with self-driving car

#26
post #6

Can't read german. Does anyone have any input on the following question? Isn't a driver meant to constantly monitor a slef driving car and manually take over? Do we know of this person had this ability? Can a person react quick enough to prevent an accident?

Right now is not even clear if the car was in self driving mode. It could be well the case, it is a "normal" accident. The titles in the news are very yellow sometimes...

Re: One dead and nine wounded after accident with self-driving car

#27
post #8
post #6

Can't read german. Does anyone have any input on the following question? Isn't a driver meant to constantly monitor a slef driving car and manually take over? Do we know of this person had this ability? Can a person react quick enough to prevent an accident?

I can't answer, but I can't imagine myself being focused enough to be able to react really quickly to an immediate danger on the road if I'm not actively driving the car. I doubt most people would be able to do this. I don't think I'm going to use a self driving car in self driving mode as long as I am expected to watch out for danger and take over if needed. If I need to constantly monitor, I might as well drive. Se…

Exactly, if the self-driving is good enough after some time you will reduce your attention and will not be able to quickly take over if the car suddenly fails to self-drive in a corner for example.

Re: One dead and nine wounded after accident with self-driving car

#28
post #19

Serious question: will we demand perfection from autonomous cars before we allow them out of “test” status? How many autonomous miles without an accident will be sufficient to prove safety? I am not diminishing this tragedy; I can only imagine the grief of the families involved and my heart goes out to them. I am also NOT making the “have to break a few eggs to make an omelette“ argument; clearly something went wrong…

> will we demand perfection from autonomous cars before we allow them out of “test” status?

Not perfection, just no human injuries for the limited duration of the tests, that is, for a few billion km or so.

Re: One dead and nine wounded after accident with self-driving car

#29
post #6

Can't read german. Does anyone have any input on the following question? Isn't a driver meant to constantly monitor a slef driving car and manually take over? Do we know of this person had this ability? Can a person react quick enough to prevent an accident?

There are plenty of other industries - CCTV monitoring, pool lifeguards, pilots using autopilot, airport x-ray operators - and they all know it's incredibly hard for humans to remain vigilant for hours on end when there's no action.

I think it's pretty well known in the self-driving car industry that safety drivers do a great job if they have to intervene several times an hour. And they're good at getting the vehicle unstuck if there's e.g. a flat tyre. But for a system that only needs an intervention once a week? The safety drivers often won't react fast enough - they're just there to take the blame.

Re: One dead and nine wounded after accident with self-driving car

#30
post #24
post #21

BMW has denied that it was an autonomous / self-driving test-car [1]. The article is from Reutlinger Generalanzeiger, a regional newspaper, and they probably have better sources than Der Spiegel. The B28 is a very scenic drive, the region is also not a densely populated area. I used to live close by. [1]: https://www.gea.de/blaulicht_artikel,-schwerer-crashnahe-zai...

A sticker on the vehicle clearly shows it was BMW autonomous test vehicle: https://twitter.com/AEONde/status/1559477911446589441

BMW also uses those stickers on vehicles that just collect data for BMWs autonomous driving program (they have the sensors, but not the software to actually self-drive)
Post reply on HN