31–40 of 59 posts
https://cloud.gov/docs/deployment/frameworks/ Not supported cloud.gov cannot run applications that use .NET Framework, or application binaries that require access to Microsoft Windows kernel or system APIs. Interesting that most container/cloud environments don't support .Net framework
https://cloud.gov/docs/deployment/frameworks/ Not supported cloud.gov cannot run applications that use .NET Framework, or application binaries that require access to Microsoft Windows kernel or system APIs. Interesting that most container/cloud environments don't support .Net framework
This is going to be a god send for a lot of smaller gov agencies.
Not quite. It's not exactly a pain-free experience in any way, shape or form.
Considering this is only for FedRAMP Low/Medium, I'm not sure why any contractor or agency would pick this over AWS GovCloud, where finding people already familiar with the platform is easy.
(Off topic): this page linked at the bottom of cloud.gov is quite interesting. Visitor analytics for government sites. https://analytics.usa.gov/
Earlier quoted context omitted.
M̶o̶r̶e̶ ̶i̶m̶p̶r̶e̶s̶s̶i̶v̶e̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶l̶a̶c̶k̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶g̶o̶o̶g̶l̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶a̶l̶y̶t̶i̶c̶s̶.̶ I was wrong. They are are using GA.
You sure? Mentions sampling limits for GA on the page.
Cloud.gov was really promising when it was announced years ago, but in practice there ended up being so many differing security requirements and security boundary tensions between them and purported customers of them that they didn’t end up having any real impact because while some could use them, many could not, and those who could often found it easier to just not use them. There were also issues getting needed per…
So we need BaaS? Bureaucracy as a service?
What I wonder is, to output a mess process, would it be faster than actual government services, or do govt services effectively act as brownian agents?
The UK equivalent has just announced it’s closing down for many of the reasons people comment here - https://gds.blog.gov.uk/2022/07/12/why-weve-decided-to-decom...
It seems like this product could be better (less risky) as a set of shared config files or something.
The latter sounds nice except for the lack of appetite (on both sides of the atlantic) for doing what's necessary to recruit and keep SREs as actual government employees rather than just contracting everything out...
Cloud.gov was really promising when it was announced years ago, but in practice there ended up being so many differing security requirements and security boundary tensions between them and purported customers of them that they didn’t end up having any real impact because while some could use them, many could not, and those who could often found it easier to just not use them. There were also issues getting needed per…
Nothing will change until that changes.
(Off topic): this page linked at the bottom of cloud.gov is quite interesting. Visitor analytics for government sites. https://analytics.usa.gov/
The vast majority of people using US gov websites are not in the US? It says 92.5% are international. Huh.