Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Gmail gets approval to move forward with plan to ruin its spam filter

androidpolice.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–12 of 12 posts

Re: Gmail gets approval to move forward with plan to ruin its spam filter

#11

Post by sio8ohPi »

Avamander wrote: post #3

What's the source on Google proposing it to the FEC? As far as I've read, FEC wrote it in a way that all large email providers have to follow, Google just happens to be one. Have I missed something?

Request: https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214R_1.pdf

Google was like "Hey, FEC, we're planning to do this thing; is it illegal? Our lawyers want to know if this counts as a campaign contribution before we start doing it and accidentally break the law". The FEC considered it and replied with a public letter stating that, in their opinion, this isn't a crime.

Final AO: https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/2022-14.pdf

Any other email provider could do the same now of course: it's just an opinion about the law, not a rule specific to Google.

Google also could have gone ahead and just done it, of course, but having the AO in hand puts the lawyers at ease.

Re: Gmail gets approval to move forward with plan to ruin its spam filter

#12

Post by Avamander »

sio8ohPi wrote: post #11
Avamander wrote: post #3

What's the source on Google proposing it to the FEC? As far as I've read, FEC wrote it in a way that all large email providers have to follow, Google just happens to be one. Have I missed something?

Request: https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214R_1.pdf Google was like "Hey, FEC, we're planning to do this thing; is it illegal? Our lawyers want to know if this counts as a campaign contribution before we start doing it and accidentally break the law". The FEC considered it and replied with a public letter stating that, in their opinion, this isn't a crime. Final AO: https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/…

Thanks! It seems to be a bit of a telephone game between the question, reply and this article. No?

I read it as Google wanting political parties to explicitly register themselves and to use proper email authentication. Then if they start enforcing it, they can't be blamed being biased (again!).

It's not that they are asking if they may let political spam trough, they want accountability from senders and freedom to mark it as spam based on "user consent". Maybe I'm looking at this too positively but to me it sounds very convenient to Google's spam filters.

Post reply on HN