Live data from Hacker News

A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor

smithsonianmag.com

221–230 of 296 posts

Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor

#221
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There has been a myriad of improvements in traditional petrol engines?

Yet our cars still can't fly, and still emit greenhouse gases...

Are you waiting for a petrol engine that doesn't emit gases? I don't understand your comment.

Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor

#222

When I first began using social media I was excited at the potential ability in the future to look back over my life. In reality I have almost completely abandoned social media and I am very happy with the Google photos remember this day feature which for me goes back at least 15 years. The only worry is how long Google maintain Photos

What? Wrong post, maybe?

Yup, thanks, was supposed to be posted here.

Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor

#223

Inspiring story all round but this paragraph stood out for me: “I didn't have a mentor to help me, really, so each time a motor failed, I had to do tons of research and try and troubleshoot what went wrong,” he says. “But eventually on the 15th motor, I was able to get a working prototype.” I imagine most 17 year old would not have kept going 15+ times until they arrived at something which worked.

My experience teaching high school kids was just the opposite. Quite a few will stay with a problem long after most so-called "prudent" adults have moved on. As adults, we forget that 17 year olds are still living their lives in a world of what they don't know, not in what they know. And once they do know they can be very insistent about being right. Because, it's all they know. It's also how a team of 16-17 yr olds…

[deleted]

Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you want to be cynical about it see https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/03/why-sc... (of course that is another clickbait article from a magazine that was good before the web but now specializes in clickbait)

I remember when I was in high-school agonizing for over a year over the 100$ fee to publish an app on google play. Ultimately it's hard to ignore the pattern when you see the stories about these precocious kids on the news, they always come from wealth.

Even I retrospect I think of this 2 ways

1. Could I have made that $100 if I did it specifically for the purpose of publishing the app? (For me, the answer is always yes at that amount. I could have easily washed some cars, mowed some grass, etc. I had so much free time)

2. When it comes to business, tech, particularly the early internet boom, probably some other domains; I’m just thankful to be in the minority of the world that speaks English. I’m self taught at most things and it’s hard enough as it is. This value of this one diminishes every year but I find it’s still useful and feel it’s a form or luck.

Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor

#225
post #8

"I heard some guy invented a car that gets 100mpg and lasts for 30 years, but the auto industry and oil industry had him killed."

Oh. No, Volkswagen and Mercedes sold cars like this 20-40 Years ago. I.e. the VW T4 or the Mercedes 200 D. That was the time where german cars were still good.

Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor

#226
post #9
post #3

It’s always the same, “ creates revolutionary thing”. And then nothing comes out of it.

That's because the "rest of the story" isn't as good. With a little digging you often find 's parent(s) are a researcher that studies that exact was building, or somehow got a job working at a lab that works on , or 's isn't as novel as article leads you to believe often with being known and unused due to some obvious flaw.

Very true. I bet Sam Zeloof's parents are rich as hell.

Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor

#230
post #84

This is inspiring, and let's look at why so many of us have the impulse to figure out what the flaw or missing part of the story is. For me, it's because I hadn't done something so cool at 17. That makes me think, huh, I wonder if I'm not a "natural born engineer". I start going through my life story so far and beating myself up for playing too many video games, or not going deep enough on my interests. Then I start…

That’s not why. It’s because the low hanging fruit has been picked decades ago so it seems, and usually is, unlikely that a 17 year old would be able to create something people paid to think about this with sustainable financial incentives were unable to do.
Post reply on HN