Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is always the case when these young and wealthy prodigies are being covered by the media. They always invent a toy that the industry already tried or keep trying to make practical. Practical as in not just performance, but cost too.
I missed the part that said his family is wealthy. Can you point me to that?
A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor
171–180 of 296 posts
Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is always the case when these young and wealthy prodigies are being covered by the media. They always invent a toy that the industry already tried or keep trying to make practical. Practical as in not just performance, but cost too.
I missed the part that said his family is wealthy. Can you point me to that?
Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Bringing the beatdown is bad for everyone. It's healthy to question media narrative as the media tend to sensationalize and embellish stories for clicks or views. It's disingenuous to try to make people feel guilty about it arguing if we question that story that child will turn bad or something, in an post-truth era. Nobody is attacking that kid, just how the media cover these stories with a template.
Will the kid understand that's everyone's intent, I wonder?
"The higher we soar the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly."
Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor
#174I've personally seen my son and his friends get into and then become proficient in a bunch of different topics, like motorcycle maintenance, programming games, film and video editing, drone racing/building, music and a ton of other real-world useful skills, all without a mentor being involved. I've personally learned more about a bunch of different topics I never had a handle on before, like physics and math, where my education was stuck at an 11th grade level until the past few years.
Compared to my teen years, the difference is breathtaking. I think the result will be a better society and a bunch of people doing what they really love for a living.
Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is always the case when these young and wealthy prodigies are being covered by the media. They always invent a toy that the industry already tried or keep trying to make practical. Practical as in not just performance, but cost too.
Frankly you could filter out every HN submission with the phrase "-year old" and miss absolutely nothing of value.
Even though the probability is low that he is founding a revolution in magnetodynamics, I personally found this story more inspiring than a blog post about the latest front-end Javascript framework.
Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
I missed the part that said his family is wealthy. Can you point me to that?
Just look at the photos. Only a fairly wealthy family could afford to buy him those instruments, and of course, the raw materials for the motors. Even his clothing suggests that there is no lack of money.
Probably a $300-400 setup, which is not nothing, but well within reach of most families.
Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor
#177This is inspiring, and let's look at why so many of us have the impulse to figure out what the flaw or missing part of the story is. For me, it's because I hadn't done something so cool at 17. That makes me think, huh, I wonder if I'm not a "natural born engineer". I start going through my life story so far and beating myself up for playing too many video games, or not going deep enough on my interests. Then I start…
Thank you for writing this.
Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor
#178Robert Sansone, great job! So many young prospective engineers read HN every day. Let's find comments that are encouraging or thought provoking or point readers in helpful directions Like @londons_explore did. Bringing the beatdown is bad for everyone. Especially bad for young engineers. This kid is impressive, straight up impressive. Let's encourage him and others like him. HN shouldn't someone's supervillain origin…
This is wonderful work and it makes me feel bubbly about the future of engineering when young adults are _this engaged_.
Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Bringing the beatdown is bad for everyone. It's healthy to question media narrative as the media tend to sensationalize and embellish stories for clicks or views. It's disingenuous to try to make people feel guilty about it arguing if we question that story that child will turn bad or something, in an post-truth era. Nobody is attacking that kid, just how the media cover these stories with a template.
I don't think this is totally on the media. The story is sufficiently weasel worded -- the motor "could" "pave the way". Anybody with any experience reads "could" as "probably not" and "pave the way" as "a tiny little step in a long process". Most 6 year olds have figured out that "maybe" means "probably not". Many adults have forgotten that lesson.
I think it's worth celebrating even minor contributions toward a potentially world changing future personally.
Re: A 17-year-old designed a novel synchronous reluctance motor
#180I never created anything so impressive while young but I was always curious and building or taking apart stuff. I always felt school got in the way.
in the end I stayed all the way until PhD and later changed careers, but that’s a different story