21–30 of 50 posts
That was fun! But I was able to solve the puzzle by continually rotating the same direction. I bet this was tried, but what's play like with the same game mechanics of this version, but with the original game play, where each move gives you a new block?
2048 was similarly flawed (cycle up, right, down, left to win), so I doubt a new block on each turn will solve the issue any more than it did for the original.
That was fun! But I was able to solve the puzzle by continually rotating the same direction. I bet this was tried, but what's play like with the same game mechanics of this version, but with the original game play, where each move gives you a new block?
Sure that solves the puzzle in 27 moves. So try to solve it in less moves.
I don't get it. The numbers add up to 128. Then what?
That was fun! But I was able to solve the puzzle by continually rotating the same direction. I bet this was tried, but what's play like with the same game mechanics of this version, but with the original game play, where each move gives you a new block?
2048 was similarly flawed (cycle up, right, down, left to win), so I doubt a new block on each turn will solve the issue any more than it did for the original.
You have a pause in there where the tiles take a moment. Please let us use that pause to rotate a second time before the tiles fall so we can also get the pieces to move across the board rather than just slide parallel.
That was fun! But I was able to solve the puzzle by continually rotating the same direction. I bet this was tried, but what's play like with the same game mechanics of this version, but with the original game play, where each move gives you a new block?
> But I was able to solve the puzzle by continually rotating the same direction. I’m not gonna ruin the original game’s mechanics for anyone who hasn’t already had them ruined, but I will say I recently tried exactly this strategy in the original and it gets you surprisingly far. But it’s definitely not a winning strategy.