Live data from Hacker News

Sean Parker: “Little Startups Are Ridiculously OverFunded”

techcrunch.com

11–20 of 133 posts

Re: Sean Parker: “Little Startups Are Ridiculously OverFunded”

#11
He paints a picture of “Google pretending to be Switzerland, but doing back deals with everyone, and Apple being left alone to build the Deathstar.”Guess where that will leave most startups.

Nice analogy. Time to move to Dantooine and work on my X-wing startup.

Re: Sean Parker: “Little Startups Are Ridiculously OverFunded”

#12
I don't see what's wrong with larger companies having a hard time attracting talent.

A good read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_the_firm

As transaction costs go down (in general), it makes less sense for us as a society to have production/value creation organized in larger organizations (firms, companies, etc) - instead in a bunch of independent smaller groups.

Companies only exist to minimize transaction costs.

Re: Sean Parker: “Little Startups Are Ridiculously OverFunded”

#13
What Sean left out was -- overfunded for whom? He implied it, but didn't say it: the bigger dogs in the fight (Facebook/Twitter/Google) have to compete for talent like everyone else.

The overfunding is mostly a problem for those larger tech companies, not the little guys.

Re: Sean Parker: “Little Startups Are Ridiculously OverFunded”

#16

What Sean left out was -- overfunded for whom? He implied it, but didn't say it: the bigger dogs in the fight (Facebook/Twitter/Google) have to compete for talent like everyone else. The overfunding is mostly a problem for those larger tech companies, not the little guys.

I suspect he means that investors are overvaluing small startups (relative to their chances of becoming successful). The consequence he worries about is that having too much funding available makes the opportunity too appealing to the best engineers, making it harder for ventures that will succeed to keep/attract talent.

Re: Sean Parker: “Little Startups Are Ridiculously OverFunded”

#18
post #5

"The problem in his view is that many of the talented engineers and product designers who are now starting their own companies could have a bigger impact at places like Facebook, and they in turn will have a hard time attracting the best talent because those people can get funded to start their own projects as well." Obviously I just read TC's article and didn't see what Parker said, but what's notably missing from t…

As many have mentioned this is just whining from a guy who has a vested interested in a big company spending lots on payroll and acq-hires.

The flip-side this creates a better market for younger or less-experienced engineers who are looking to learn and grow. This group of people will never be able to get a job with Facebook, but can certainly join a company who is willing to grow with them.

Re: Sean Parker: “Little Startups Are Ridiculously OverFunded”

#19

I don't see what's wrong with larger companies having a hard time attracting talent. A good read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_the_firm As transaction costs go down (in general), it makes less sense for us as a society to have production/value creation organized in larger organizations (firms, companies, etc) - instead in a bunch of independent smaller groups. Companies only exist to minimize transaction co…

I learned something new today. thanks.

Re: Sean Parker: “Little Startups Are Ridiculously OverFunded”

#20
post #4

How exactly does he expect the internet to consolidate like the PC industry? How can the internet consolidate?

What I'm wondering is, how do more and smaller startups equate to eventual consolidation? His preference seems to be that engineers would elect to become agents or enablers of consolidation by joining the very companies that have the scale to consolidate a market.

His two points don't seem to have any intersection that I can see.

Post reply on HN