Live data from Hacker News

Fake IMDB credits

peabee.substack.com

71–80 of 260 posts

Re: Fake IMDB credits

#71
post #4

Reminds of this "Man fools security to backstage at a Peking Duk gig by changing the band's Wikipedia page to describe himself as a family member" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3345074/Man-fools-s...

Is ‘to backstage’ a verb?

You should read this like "man fools { security-to-the-backstage }" not "man fools { security } in order to backstage ".

Re: Fake IMDB credits

#72
post #68

I remember imdb being meticulous in its record keeping ~15 years ago/before it got bought by Amazon (though its quality held up for at least a few years after). I remember looking up details for kinda obscure movies and talent, and my mind being blown when info for either was listed. Now, it takes years to see the filmography of a given actor from a streaming show.

> ~15 years ago/before it got bought by Amazon

They were bought by Amazon 24 years ago now, in 1998.

Re: Fake IMDB credits

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is ‘to backstage’ a verb?

You should read this like "man fools { security-to-the-backstage }" not "man fools { security } in order to backstage ".

But in British English ‘security to backstage’ would usually be ‘security for backstage’ or ‘backstage security’.

Re: Fake IMDB credits

#74
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IMDb was founded in Cardiff England.

There’s a thousand Welshman looking for your blood now. Cardiff is in Wales. Initially was called the Cardiff Internet Movie Database (it was hosted at the university of Cardiff)

For the majority of my youth, I had assumed that England, Great Britain and the United Kingdom were all aliases for the same place. Thankfully I never had occasion to reveal this error to UK folks who might be alienated by it.

Re: Fake IMDB credits

#75
I have always wondered about the ratings. It seems to me that all movies below 6 is trash. Has this always been this way? One would imagine that a 5 star rating would be ok since it is right between 0 (bad) and 10 (great). I guess some kind of inflation in the ratings is going on, but how is such things prevented in these kinds of ratings over time? Is it even possible to prevent?

Re: Fake IMDB credits

#76
post #68

I remember imdb being meticulous in its record keeping ~15 years ago/before it got bought by Amazon (though its quality held up for at least a few years after). I remember looking up details for kinda obscure movies and talent, and my mind being blown when info for either was listed. Now, it takes years to see the filmography of a given actor from a streaming show.

Side note, I'd really appreciate if you could close off your opening (. I don't know where to stop reading with a lower volume in my head.

Now you've added another one!!

Re: Fake IMDB credits

#77

I have always wondered about the ratings. It seems to me that all movies below 6 is trash. Has this always been this way? One would imagine that a 5 star rating would be ok since it is right between 0 (bad) and 10 (great). I guess some kind of inflation in the ratings is going on, but how is such things prevented in these kinds of ratings over time? Is it even possible to prevent?

I think the false assumption you are making is that the "average" movie is good. There are a lot of trash movies out there.

Re: Fake IMDB credits

#78
post #18

Poor boys from India game a system that was set up by Rich Tech Bros in Silicon Valley to fund their "family foundations" and 20-room houses in Atherton? I don't call it Outrage; I call it "Slumdog Millionaire: Part II"

Where is the outrage you are referring to?

Re: Fake IMDB credits

#80

IMDB lost all my respect many years ago when they made clear with their actions that they support fake reviews. When the problem started to grow beyond the occasional vandalism, they still had a very effective discussion section in which users soon began to expose fake reviews. Their response? Of course remove the discussion section! IMDB today has some use for their database only; but they lost any credibility on ev…

Comment sections on many websites across the net got scrapped around the same time. Ostensibly because some people use them to say nasty things, but really I think it's about keeping the masses consuming rather than creating. The corporations prefer that creation of content and narratives be restricted to an elite few, while the masses dutifully consume. At the end of the day it's about protecting their bottom line.
Post reply on HN