well politically correct answer is to fork off
they should fork it instead haha
11–20 of 243 posts
well politically correct answer is to fork off
they should fork it instead haha
Just reply something like "This feature does not interest me, but patches are welcome!" and leave it at that. This does not mean you actually will merge any PR for said future, should they ever materialize.
Just reply something like "This feature does not interest me, but patches are welcome!" and leave it at that. This does not mean you actually will merge any PR for said future, should they ever materialize.
If you don’t intend to merge the feature, you should not say that patches are welcome, that’s an asshole move.
If you’re not sure, say that and that they can open a pr but you can’t make any promise.
If you’re not interested in the feature and are not willing to maintain it, say that as well.
"I am declining this as it is not fitting with the direction of the project and other users' requirements. You are free to fork it and maintain your own version"
If you think it is a useful feature tell him that you currently don't have time to implement it yourself but a PR is welcome.
Often people only want that there issue is tracked, so to avoid conflict and just do nothing just tell them that it goes into the backlog of future features to be considered ;)
If it's public facing I would suggest that you keep it in context and PR friendly and say something like: "I am declining this as it is not fitting with the direction of the project and other users' requirements. You are free to fork it and maintain your own version"
I’d leave that out. That’s unnecessary as it’s an implied freedom of oss, and it can come off as aggressive / dismissive.
If it's public facing I would suggest that you keep it in context and PR friendly and say something like: "I am declining this as it is not fitting with the direction of the project and other users' requirements. You are free to fork it and maintain your own version"
> You are free to fork it and maintain your own version I’d leave that out. That’s unnecessary as it’s an implied freedom of oss, and it can come off as aggressive / dismissive.
Might as well ban some commenter from your project (not sure how Github manages this)
A lot of feature requests are done to gain clout anyway
I find doing this type of thing (creating nice canned responses, creating reusable answers) nearly always pays off in the medium and long term and find that it’s much easier to put the effort into a response knowing that you’ll get long lived value from it vs it just being useful for one person.
Similarly, I often find others have done similar and if their thoughts align with mine I don’t need to write the answer myself but instead can refer to someone else’s blog post etc.
I mean it’s a bit glib but I’m serious.
This presumes you want to be paid. Many don’t because it means it’s not fun anymore. I’m in that camp.