Live data from Hacker News

Neil deGrasse Tyson AMA

reddit.com

61–68 of 68 posts

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson AMA

#61

Q:What is your favorite fact about the Universe? A:That is will never end. That it's on a one way trip of expansion. Something that many find to be philosophically unsettling. My view is that if your philosophy is not unsettled daily then you are blind to all the universe has to offer. Priceless

That's nice and all, but most humans in the world (including the western world) don't have the luxury of being able to let themselves be unsettled daily :/

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson AMA

#62
post #61

Q:What is your favorite fact about the Universe? A:That is will never end. That it's on a one way trip of expansion. Something that many find to be philosophically unsettling. My view is that if your philosophy is not unsettled daily then you are blind to all the universe has to offer. Priceless

That's nice and all, but most humans in the world (including the western world) don't have the luxury of being able to let themselves be unsettled daily :/

Most of them could have this luxury. They pick other luxuries first.

Which is, in my view, a mistake. Those who seek out challenge tend to end up with a lot more luxury than those who don't.

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson AMA

#63

Anyone interested in NdGT, check out the show he hosts: Nova Science Now http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/ You can watch full episodes online, no commercial interruptions after they start. It does a good job at filling the popular science video niche, in addition to Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman.

I have been looking for a good science show, but Nova scienceNOW wasn't it. Not so much the content as the absolutely juvenline format. Can someone explain how I have misunderstood and the show really is meant for kids? Because it's designed like a kid's show, complete with silly music, wacky editing, colourful demonstrations/analogies to illustrate scientific principles, and narration that sounds as if written for a…

Glad to hear my programmes are well received. If you haven't seen it, you should also check out "Secret Life of Chaos" - on YouTube.

Jim Al-Khalili (Twitter: @jimalkhalili)

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson AMA

#64

Anyone interested in NdGT, check out the show he hosts: Nova Science Now http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/ You can watch full episodes online, no commercial interruptions after they start. It does a good job at filling the popular science video niche, in addition to Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman.

I have been looking for a good science show, but Nova scienceNOW wasn't it. Not so much the content as the absolutely juvenline format. Can someone explain how I have misunderstood and the show really is meant for kids? Because it's designed like a kid's show, complete with silly music, wacky editing, colourful demonstrations/analogies to illustrate scientific principles, and narration that sounds as if written for a…

> Popular science, sometimes called literature of science, is interpretation of science intended for a general audience. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_science

Conflation of genres imo, both science shows and "popular science" shows can be enjoyed independently of one another, similar to how adults may enjoy both drama and comedy. From what I've seen of Bang Goes the Theory on youtube, it appears to be a clone of MythBusters and cover much fluffier one-off engineering problems simple enough to reproduce on TV.

On the other hand, ScienceNow is more of a newsmagazine that highlights what several different researchers are currently working on, and why they are interested in that problem. Ex: natural language processing robots, growing human ears on mice for reconstructive surgery, etc.

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson AMA

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have been looking for a good science show, but Nova scienceNOW wasn't it. Not so much the content as the absolutely juvenline format. Can someone explain how I have misunderstood and the show really is meant for kids? Because it's designed like a kid's show, complete with silly music, wacky editing, colourful demonstrations/analogies to illustrate scientific principles, and narration that sounds as if written for a…

> Popular science, sometimes called literature of science, is interpretation of science intended for a general audience. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_science Conflation of genres imo, both science shows and "popular science" shows can be enjoyed independently of one another, similar to how adults may enjoy both drama and comedy. From what I've seen of Bang Goes the Theory on youtube, it appears to be a clone…

It's true that "Bang Goes the Theory" has elements of Mythbusters, but it's focused on the science as opposed to the action movie stuff. The programme is basically "popular science -- you know, for teens!". Their magazine style format typically has one segment where they put a scientific hypothesis, law or principle in practice by building various gadgets. Other segments are news-related stuff, such as (just after the Japanese earthquake) a long segment on the science of tsunamis. I'm not in the target demographic at all, so I don't really follow it, but I appreciate their focus on educating kids and encouraging scientific thinking about young people.

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson AMA

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have been looking for a good science show, but Nova scienceNOW wasn't it. Not so much the content as the absolutely juvenline format. Can someone explain how I have misunderstood and the show really is meant for kids? Because it's designed like a kid's show, complete with silly music, wacky editing, colourful demonstrations/analogies to illustrate scientific principles, and narration that sounds as if written for a…

Glad to hear my programmes are well received. If you haven't seen it, you should also check out "Secret Life of Chaos" - on YouTube. Jim Al-Khalili (Twitter: @jimalkhalili)

That was unexpected! Hi! Will check out the Chaos programme. I actually watched your doc on the aftermath of Fukushima earlier this week, and was very pleased with how balanced and low-key it was done; it was also unexpectedly moving.

"The Story of Electricity" and "Everything and Nothing" is also in my queue. And your University of Surrey session! You're a prolific guy! Between all the documentaries and books and radio programmes and lectures, do you find any time to do science research at all?

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson AMA

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly. Just because I declare something doesn't mean I have to back it up with facts. I trust my gut. That's where the truth lies.

Not every turn of phrase entitles you to a link, you literal-minded buffoon.

Great! Hostility. A welcome addition to a discourse. What you said wasn't a turn of phrase. You stated it as a fact.

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson AMA

#68
post #62
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's nice and all, but most humans in the world (including the western world) don't have the luxury of being able to let themselves be unsettled daily :/

Most of them could have this luxury. They pick other luxuries first. Which is, in my view, a mistake. Those who seek out challenge tend to end up with a lot more luxury than those who don't.

This is probably a privileged viewpoint which is only possible in certain cases, i'm guessing (i'm not saying that you or me are privileged, necessarily...just that it's still a 'luxury' to some extent)
Post reply on HN