Live data from Hacker News

DALL·E 2 prompt book [pdf]

dallery.gallery

131–140 of 157 posts

Re: DALL·E 2 prompt book [pdf]

#131

I just got access to the DALL-E 2 beta, and it's a ton of fun to make pictures out of everyday occurrences as prompts. Someone else here on HN observed that everyday people don't "get" how huge this all is. I experimented with asking random acquaintances at a local cafe for prompts and showed them the generated pictures. All but one person was totally unimpressed. If everything feels like magic, then what's one more…

None of us are immune to that. The amount of magic we all rely on every day is incomprehensible. We just take it for granted that there is power to our house, the trains arrive on time, the bridge doesn’t collapse, the coffee tastes nice and costs little.

The commonplace thing that amazes me the most is the availability of food. My mind boggles at the complexity of getting hundreds of types of foods to a grocery store on a regular basis. I have no direct access to food, and if the food supply chain breaks down, I die. But it doesn't break down.

Re: DALL·E 2 prompt book [pdf]

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The median and average are equivalent in a normal distribution.

But then would you still be able to say “most” are below average of the distribution is normal?

If we assume intelligence is a normal distribution, then we can say half of the population is below average. I think it's fair to categorize half as most.

Re: DALL·E 2 prompt book [pdf]

#133

OpenAI has pretty much been ruined for me after they sold their souls to Microsoft, stopped releasing all their source code, and then dishonestly refer to their sad practice of censoring the training data as "AI safety/alignment" when in fact it will never be a reasonable AI safety technique in the long run, and is only done to avoid bad PR. Clearly OpenAI is no longer a company worthy of its founding principles of o…

Thanks. Really, turns out, MS is their main investor. And at first I thought it was a Google project :D

Re: DALL·E 2 prompt book [pdf]

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

None of us are immune to that. The amount of magic we all rely on every day is incomprehensible. We just take it for granted that there is power to our house, the trains arrive on time, the bridge doesn’t collapse, the coffee tastes nice and costs little.

if you enjoyed this comment, you may also enjoy the The Trigger Effect episode from James Burke's Connections series. https://archive.org/details/james-burke-connections_s01e01

[deleted]

Re: DALL·E 2 prompt book [pdf]

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But then would you still be able to say “most” are below average of the distribution is normal?

If we assume intelligence is a normal distribution, then we can say half of the population is below average. I think it's fair to categorize half as most.

“Half = most” is… innovative. I like to think of it as “half = so many that you’ll run into a lot of them.”

Re: DALL·E 2 prompt book [pdf]

#136

Prompt crafting is quickly becoming an art. I just found out yesterday that there's actually market places for buying and selling prompts [0]. It can really make a big difference if you can tune the image by adding the right words. Midjourney [1] even allows things such as adjusting the weight of each keyword or how "literal" the AI should take your prompt. [0] https://promptbase.com/ [1] https://midjourney.gitbook.i…

That's kind of depressing really. It's like paying someone for google search terms. I remember when the internet was full of sites filled with interesting and effective google search terms (called "dorks") but nobody was charging $2 for each one, they were just sharing something cool with the world and helping everyone use the tool more effectively.

I don't really agree with your take.

First off, the PDF in this very post, as well as promptwiki link posted elsewhere in the comments, shows that there are definitely people doing this for free too.

As for your analogy, I'd say it's closer to paying someone to help you find something obscure and hard to find on Google. Anything that requires skill and time to do should be allowed to be monetized. Of course, as you mention, there will always be people doing and posting it for free, but I don't see why people shouldn't be able to make money from something they've taken time to master.

Dall-E is a tool, and this is like hiring an expert that can use that tool effectively. It's no different than hiring someone to Photoshop something for you, or more precisely here, paying to download/license premade Photoshop content someone put time and effort creating.

Re: DALL·E 2 prompt book [pdf]

#137
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been using Midjourney [1] (it's not free, 25 photos demo, then 10$ for ~200 photos or 30$ for unlimited I think?). It's fairly fast, ~20s for a grid of 4, then as much for upscaling. I like the controls, it lets you do variations and tweak the image as you go. It's not as good for doing concrete asks, but it's very good for getting specific vibes. The website feed [1] requires Discord login to view examples, but…

https://midjourney.gitbook.io/docs/billing#plans monthly plans: * $10 for ~200 prompts * $30 for ~900 prompts + unlimited "slow" prompts where your job is put at the end of the queue and you have to wait longer (no idea how much longer though.. are we talking about seconds or hours here?)

It probably depends highly on load / time of day. I agree it would be nice to have concrete stats though about the average and variance.

I just got access to Dall-E today, and there it's 115 prompts for 15$, so roughly twice the price.

Re: DALL·E 2 prompt book [pdf]

#138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's kind of depressing really. It's like paying someone for google search terms. I remember when the internet was full of sites filled with interesting and effective google search terms (called "dorks") but nobody was charging $2 for each one, they were just sharing something cool with the world and helping everyone use the tool more effectively.

I don't really agree with your take. First off, the PDF in this very post, as well as promptwiki link posted elsewhere in the comments, shows that there are definitely people doing this for free too. As for your analogy, I'd say it's closer to paying someone to help you find something obscure and hard to find on Google. Anything that requires skill and time to do should be allowed to be monetized. Of course, as you m…

> As for your analogy, I'd say it's closer to paying someone to help you find something obscure and hard to find on Google.

That's exactly what google dorks were. Google started out as a great search engine, but it's also a tool and 'Google Fu' was a real thing. Anyone could easily find song lyrics and news articles. It took effort (time and skill) to understand how google worked and how to format searches to get the results you were interested in for many obscure types of data. I'm not suggesting that people shouldn't have been allowed to charge for Google search terms, only that unlike today making a fast dollar wasn't anyone's first priority.

A marketplace for Google search terms might have been just as successful, but it never happened and I'd like to think we were all better off for it. Instead that information was shared freely and widely to anyone interested and it served us well for many years until Google degraded their product by no longer following their own rules and much of that became useless.

I'd argue that this is much less like paying someone to create something in photoshop (Here you give the right commands, DALL·E 2 does all the work) and much more like charging for a tutorial on how to use photoshop to achieve certain effects (You follow the right steps, photoshop does all the work). There's nothing wrong with charging for tutorials (many do and have done), and I'm glad that there are still people willing to share what they've learned without throwing up a paywall, but the rush to monetize here was shockingly fast. An entire infrastructure was put into place to support buyers, sellers, purchases, featured products, and payments before many even had a chance to try this new tool for themselves.

I see it as a reflection of how much the culture of the internet has changed. The commercialization of the web has become so pervasive that many people can't imagine an internet without a profit incentive (often expressed as some form of 'the internet couldn't exist without ads!' or 'No one would create content if they aren't getting paid to do it!'), but those of us who are older will remember a healthy and thriving internet that existed long before it was commercialized and how many useful, popular, and helpful websites and services were created and maintained without any thought given to "Yeah, but what's in it for me?" and the overall vibe on the internet was about sharing (or more cynically, showing off) vs making money.

Re: DALL·E 2 prompt book [pdf]

#139
post #113
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was generating some images of parrots for a friend that's into bird photography when it occurred to me, Prometheus stole fire from the gods and was sentenced to be pecked at by birds. Today is the first day of forever in the infinite aviary. Pictures of birds are no longer scarce. Every bird that ever was, is, or could be is mere key strokes away. When Prometheus stole fire, he couldn't have actually known what fir…

Morse code translator: https://morsecode.world/international/translator.html (WHAT HAS GOD WROUGHT?)

you rock
Post reply on HN