It appears that someone circumnavigated the scientific process and forced UCP in. That would be whoever benefitted financially from the decision to fuck our soldiers over.
U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
11–20 of 309 posts
Re: U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
What law was broken?
idk, but it seems to undermine national security. Maybe in here somewhere, "Various statutes supplement the provisions of Chapter 37 to criminalize activities that jeopardize the national defense or national security." IANAL ;)
Re: U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
#13Today's camo is so much better than the red coats the British were wearing in the 18th century. chuckle
Re: U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
#14It appears that someone circumnavigated the scientific process and forced UCP in. That would be whoever benefitted financially from the decision to fuck our soldiers over.
Don't presume malice when incompetence will do.
Re: U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
#15Plus then you could convince a few of your coworkers to show up in camo with you and make your manager nervous you’re about to do a hostile takeover of the company.
Re: U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
#16It appears that someone circumnavigated the scientific process and forced UCP in. That would be whoever benefitted financially from the decision to fuck our soldiers over.
Are these people in prison yet?
None of that information is available to you.
Re: U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
#17(For what it's worth, the Multicam pattern, which is slightly modified to the OCP pattern now in use by the US Army/Air Force, manages to do a better job than the UCP pattern at actually being universal camo, and it's not even the best of the tests.)
The NIR requirements means you can almost see how the decision might be justifiable... but that no one actually tested the resulting pattern as a check? I mean, one of the most salient facts about human color processing is that we evaluate colors based on their surrounding context, so even if individual colors work well, you would need to check their performance in their context to make sure they still work well.
Re: U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
#18Now I want to show up at our Zoom meetings in full camo. Doctors and soldiers get such cool uniforms, but us programmers are just business casual. Plus then you could convince a few of your coworkers to show up in camo with you and make your manager nervous you’re about to do a hostile takeover of the company.
Re: U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
#19Re: U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
#20Today's camo is so much better than the red coats the British were wearing in the 18th century. chuckle
The British red coats were a kind of dazzle camouflage, making it hard to see individuals within the group. People weren't stupid back then - they just had different design goals to what we have now.
Furthermore, if they were trying to blend in with each other like one big homogeneous mass of infantry they wouldn't have given everyone hats in a contrasting color.