Live data from Hacker News

Why do so many technical recruiters suck?

mikebz.com

41–50 of 59 posts

Re: Why do so many technical recruiters suck?

#41
The author should take his own advice more seriously. He links to his companies job postings, which consist of a long list of mostly boilerplate required qualifications, and little to nothing about what the company may have to offer prospective employees.

Not even a hint that they may be interested in the needs of the people they're looking to hire.

Re: Why do so many technical recruiters suck?

#42
post #2

For the same reason most (if not all) real estate agents are worthless. There's no barrier to entry and there's the allure of easy money. Until the profits collapse the market will be inundated with wannabes.

Wait, if they get 20k per candidate hired, and the turnover is 90 days, what kind of schlock does go back to them? And what kind does not sure them when its obvious the candidate did not have any of the advertised qualifications?

Re: Why do so many technical recruiters suck?

#43
post #25

The problem with recruiters is that they're the only (potential) vendor/service provider to your business that doesn't actually understand the product they are delivering to you. * My hosting partner knows how operate servers and datacenters * My employee payroll + benefits partner knows employee laws. * My lawyer knows corporate law * My CPA knows accountancy and tax rules. * My recruiter is unlikely to understand v…

You just answered your own question. People who understand very much about developers and the types of developers for specific roles are the requirements of a good technical manager.

A recruiter who's very good with technology and who can program is better off being a developer financially.

A recruiter who's very good with people and navigating the intricacies of a project is better off financially being an internal HR manager or project manager.

Re: Why do so many technical recruiters suck?

#44
We've never found recruiters useful. Perhaps it was the fact that most of the positions they recruited for were for large companies, and their candidate pool reflected that. Once however, when we were truly desperate, we tried to work with one agency.

I said right away that the only way this would work would be based on a success fee, and they accepted that. Also, I demanded that they send me a sample of anonymized CVs before we signed anything. So a couple of hours later they send me these three CVs, and when I looked at them, I immediately recognized the candidates (it's a small world, isn't it?).

The next step was to call the candidates and ask them if they're were really looking for a job. Turns out not one knew anything about the company in question and none of them were interested in switching jobs.

Re: Why do so many technical recruiters suck?

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A classic bad sales technique. I'll put up with a lot of things, and under some circumstances I'll accept someone acknowledging what I've said and saying they can't provide that, but if you give me the impression that you just plain don't listen at all, you've just ended the conversation, permanently.

Think it through. It's a good sales technique. There are broadly speaking two kinds of sales. There is the kind of sales that takes months -- eg flogging SAP to a sap -- and there are the kinds that take minutes. Recruiting falls into the second category, along with second-hand cars, door to door encyclopaedias, life insurance and so on. In the short-sale field, when is the salesman ever going to see you again? If he…

> There is no incentive to favour the long term. The sale is made now or not at all.

As a Tech Recruiter I completely disagree. Granted a significant proportion of the recruiter community tend to favour the short term gain but ultimately the only way to succeed in the industry is to cultivate long term relationships and generate repeat business.

Re: Why do so many technical recruiters suck?

#46
As a Tech Recruiter and former Developer I've been first-hand witness to the incredible hypocrisy and mind-boggling anti-logic perpetrated by the recruitment industry and I've attempted to answer your question at length in my blog post 'All that's wrong with the recruitment industry' http://voltsteve.blogspot.com/2011/07/all-that-is-wrong-with...

Someone in the comments below mentioned how they don't feel that the recruitment industry can be disrupted whereas I completely disagree. The industry is already suffering and multiple different factors are playing a part. As PG mentioned in a recent comment on a similar post, more and more companies are investing in building internal recruitment teams.

For the record, I agree that most tech recruiters suck. Even if you find a decent one, chances are they work for an organisation that imparts a vast amount of KPI's and compliance issues that generally restrict their capabilities and creativity.

Re: Why do so many technical recruiters suck?

#47
post #15
post #10

Anybody have experience with Hackruiter or TopProspect as alternatives?

Never heard of them, actually. But the recruiter space doesn't seem to need disruption, since it fundamentally only makes sense in a pre internet age. Today candidates can find any company they like online and apply right then and there. The same goes for any company which can contact a candidate directly (either through a his/her blog if the prospect has one or through any of a number of aggregator services). Today…

I interviewed for a job as a recruiter once (what can i say, I was desperate). Anyway, during the interview, the recruiter told me that they get hired so that the company can select specific kinds of candidates (national, football player etc). In essence, recruiters can allow companies to discriminate against minorities or whatever without having legal problems. This probably doesn't apply in the tech field but it may be why big companies still use them.

Re: Why do so many technical recruiters suck?

#48
post #46

As a Tech Recruiter and former Developer I've been first-hand witness to the incredible hypocrisy and mind-boggling anti-logic perpetrated by the recruitment industry and I've attempted to answer your question at length in my blog post 'All that's wrong with the recruitment industry' http://voltsteve.blogspot.com/2011/07/all-that-is-wrong-with... Someone in the comments below mentioned how they don't feel that the re…

Is it hard finding staff that have sufficient technical knowledge?

It feels like the recruitment industry in general is very cut throat and has high turnover.

And in an industry that has a shortage of skilled people to begin with, that's probably not a good thing.

Re: Why do so many technical recruiters suck?

#49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Believe it or not a recruiter can do a very good job filling technical positions without a strong understanding of the technology. All you need to know to get started is how to spot a qualified person, and the hiring manager can help with that.

I'll go with "not" when it comes to the recruiters in the Chicago area. I regularly get contacted for roles I have no measurable experience in, such as Django jobs, or really anything web related. While I have extensive Python knowledge, I haven't touched Django outside of a tutorial or two on a rainy day. They seem to want to extrapolate Python expertise to cover everything that uses Python, but it doesn't work like…

Successful recruiting is all about having a great process. Domain knowledge in a specific area is helpful, but not required. For example, I might talk to a hiring manager about the following...

"Why do you need REALLY need a Python developer? Is it because you have problems that a great software engineer without Python knowledge can't solve? If so, give me a couple examples of things you need that only a Python whiz could do, and I will make sure applicants can do that. If we can't attract the right applicants, I will ask you will need to dedicate more time to recruiting or refine your expectations."

I may come to you with a Django job, but I will be prepared to tell you why the hiring manager doesn't need Django experience at all.

Re: Why do so many technical recruiters suck?

#50
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Think it through. It's a good sales technique. There are broadly speaking two kinds of sales. There is the kind of sales that takes months -- eg flogging SAP to a sap -- and there are the kinds that take minutes. Recruiting falls into the second category, along with second-hand cars, door to door encyclopaedias, life insurance and so on. In the short-sale field, when is the salesman ever going to see you again? If he…

> There is no incentive to favour the long term. The sale is made now or not at all. As a Tech Recruiter I completely disagree. Granted a significant proportion of the recruiter community tend to favour the short term gain but ultimately the only way to succeed in the industry is to cultivate long term relationships and generate repeat business.

It'd be nice if there were more like you.
Post reply on HN