Live data from Hacker News

S3 isn't getting cheaper

matt-rickard.com

1–10 of 215 posts

Re: S3 isn't getting cheaper

#4
I suspect it might be an issue of "cheap enough". For smaller Projects, the s3 storage cost doesn't matter too much. Medium sized projects may find the tradeoff between price vs cost of a custom solution to still be more than good enough. Large enough projects simply chose a different, more specialized solution anyway

Re: S3 isn't getting cheaper

#5
It looks like the most recent data point, S3 was actually cheaper than the raw storage, while providing 11 9's of durability, across multiple AZs. Still looks like a pretty good deal, as the price of storage has mostly flatlined in this graph.

Nor does this even account for cold storage, or reduced redundancy.

Re: S3 isn't getting cheaper

#6
> Yet, AWS S3 pricing hasn't decreased as fast as the underlying storage costs. > […] > Another blog post analyzes the same theory for compute and finds a similar story using pricing data from AWS EC2.

AWS used to do frequent price reductions years ago. At a certain point they seem to have stopped doing that and are now only doing them rarely. That's really a shame as there are still a lot of AWS offerings which are priced way too high (data transfer being the most prominent one).

It'll be interesting to see if and up to which point AWS will keep the prices stable with raising inflation.

Re: S3 isn't getting cheaper

#8
> It's hard to come to a firm conclusion since pricing data is held very secretly (AWS quickly deletes announcements of historical price decreases).

That's not correct. Here is the history of every (properly tagged) price reduction AWS ever announced: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/category/price-reduction/

Re: S3 isn't getting cheaper

#9
As a European I take not getting many times as expensive, like our fuel, energy and food prices. I wonder how the European cloud will fare this winter, and how many European customers we will lose.
Post reply on HN