Live data from Hacker News

Five Laws of Human Stupidity (1976)

harmful.cat-v.org

11–20 of 100 posts

Re: Five Laws of Human Stupidity (1976)

#11

This is so horrible on so many levels But at the same time oh man do I so totally identify with this And now I feel a bit guilty

This is so horrible on so many levels

Could you ellaborate? Do you find it cruel, wrong... stupid?

Just FYI: this is old, from the seventies I think.

Re: Five Laws of Human Stupidity (1976)

#13
post #6

These are great. I've always used a rule of thumb. Dumb = ignorant, seems to get better with more knowledge Stupid = confidently wrong to the point of net negative for everyone, seems to get worse with more knowledge

Sounds like this goes against the old saying "I may be stupid but I'm not dumb", i.e. I'm not book smart but I have common sense.

>> Sounds like this goes against the old saying "I may be stupid but I'm not dumb", i.e. I'm not book smart but I have common sense.

There is another saying "You can't fix stupid" so giving them more knowledge doesn't help, it just expands their sphere of influence.

Re: Five Laws of Human Stupidity (1976)

#15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like this goes against the old saying "I may be stupid but I'm not dumb", i.e. I'm not book smart but I have common sense.

>> Sounds like this goes against the old saying "I may be stupid but I'm not dumb", i.e. I'm not book smart but I have common sense. There is another saying "You can't fix stupid" so giving them more knowledge doesn't help, it just expands their sphere of influence.

There's an old Chinese/Japanese proverb about this even.

"Baka ni tsukeru kusuri nashi"

The medicine which can be applied to stupidity, does not exist.

Re: Five Laws of Human Stupidity (1976)

#16
I used to host this article. Somebody in Italy claimed to own the copyright ("literary heirs" of Carlos), and demanded I take it down, despite that Carlos clearly wanted it distributed far and wide. He's dead now, so he gets no say anymore.

Re: Five Laws of Human Stupidity (1976)

#17
post #6

These are great. I've always used a rule of thumb. Dumb = ignorant, seems to get better with more knowledge Stupid = confidently wrong to the point of net negative for everyone, seems to get worse with more knowledge

Stupid is often a product of dumb plus narcissism, a stubborn unwillingness to learn.

Re: Five Laws of Human Stupidity (1976)

#18
post #7
post #5

I would propose a more measured approach to this subject. To (mis)quote Jesus, "let he who has never done anything stupid in his life cast the first (metaphorical) stone". There certainly are people who do stupid things all the time, but there also are people who do stupid things relatively rarely, and those things can still have costly consequences. For instance, I once totaled a car because I trusted that another s…

I find the car signalling problem interesting. Where I was born people trust the turn signalling and drive early. When I moved to the UK I (luckily) quickly realised you cannot do this here. Everyone waits until the car actually starts turning before driving. Even if it's signalling, no one trusts that, possibly creating less pressure for correct signalling. It makes traffic slightly slower but avoids the possibility…

Not trusting others' turn signals seems more like defensive driving than bad driving.

Re: Five Laws of Human Stupidity (1976)

#19
post #16

I used to host this article. Somebody in Italy claimed to own the copyright ("literary heirs" of Carlos), and demanded I take it down, despite that Carlos clearly wanted it distributed far and wide. He's dead now, so he gets no say anymore.

He needed to put it in the public domain or something similar if he really cared.

Re: Five Laws of Human Stupidity (1976)

#20
This is a terrible view of humankind, society and the people around you.

What is "stupidity" other than a concept vague enough that you can just throw it at anybody to, in part, immediately raise yourself to some level of superiority, and essentially defame without actually having to argue anything? Obviously they are stupid, and since you realize that, you are obviously not, so what's there to argue, right?

Human intelligence, if that's what "stupidity" is supposed to be about, is many-dimensional. Even within a single dimension, most actions, opinions or expressions of such are not clear-cut more or less intelligent. Often you just happen to agree with one or see problems with another one. But it doesn't immediately mean somebody is "stupid". And it also ignores the "why". Maybe somebody is lacking education in a certain field, perhaps because of a lack of funds or opportunity because they grew up in a disadvantaged neighborhood. Or because of a medical condition. Or maybe they are just tired. Who knows. Oh right, they are "stupid", that's what they are.

And finally, even if somebody does something "stupid" .. don't put yourself on such a high horse. You likely also do "stupid" things. All the time. You don't realize it though, you'd otherwise stop doing that thing. So, if the conclusion is that we are all "stupid" in some way, they yeah, we can claim that there are "stupid" people all around us, but that's not a particularly meaningful statement.

Honestly, this was a very sad read.

Post reply on HN