To me, Tom Bombadil is the introduction of natural magic. He is nature, indicating to the reader that there is a source of magic beyond the elves, Wizards, and Sauron. There are many magical creatures in Middle-Earth without a described source, which to me makes the whole story feel more magic. The Ents probably being the chief example. Another important role of Tom’s is his introduction of magic and power outside of…
Some researchers consider Tom to be the 'reader'
Oldest and Fatherless: The Terrible Secret of Tom Bombadil (2011)
21–30 of 349 posts
Re: Oldest and Fatherless: The Terrible Secret of Tom Bombadil (2011)
#22this is the best thing ever posted on HN..... going to restart the lord of the rings podcast now.
Re: Oldest and Fatherless: The Terrible Secret of Tom Bombadil (2011)
#23Re: Oldest and Fatherless: The Terrible Secret of Tom Bombadil (2011)
#24Is this popping up because of Elden Ring coming out in the fall?
Re: Oldest and Fatherless: The Terrible Secret of Tom Bombadil (2011)
#25To me, Tom Bombadil is the introduction of natural magic. He is nature, indicating to the reader that there is a source of magic beyond the elves, Wizards, and Sauron. There are many magical creatures in Middle-Earth without a described source, which to me makes the whole story feel more magic. The Ents probably being the chief example. Another important role of Tom’s is his introduction of magic and power outside of…
Some researchers consider Tom to be the 'reader'
Re: Oldest and Fatherless: The Terrible Secret of Tom Bombadil (2011)
#26Re: Oldest and Fatherless: The Terrible Secret of Tom Bombadil (2011)
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
A character from Lord of the Rings. He's a hermit living in nature, and one of the more notable things omitted in the movies. Probably because apart from saving the Hobbits from some dangers early in their journey he doesn't play much of a role.
Sorry, lame joke. Peter Jackson cut Tom Bombadil from the movies, and it was a meme 20 years ago.
Re: Oldest and Fatherless: The Terrible Secret of Tom Bombadil (2011)
#28Re: Oldest and Fatherless: The Terrible Secret of Tom Bombadil (2011)
#29I've been a fan of Tolkien for decades, and this doesn't match up with my experience at all...Tolkien fans seem to generally love Tom, and many were deeply disappointed that he wasn't in the movies (even though his exclusion makes perfect sense). Did I just run in different Tolkien circles than the author?
Re: Oldest and Fatherless: The Terrible Secret of Tom Bombadil (2011)
#30this is the best thing ever posted on HN..... going to restart the lord of the rings podcast now.
What podcast is that? I'm just reading the books for the first time.