Live data from Hacker News

A little trick to spam the spammers (2021)

misc.l3m.in

221–230 of 231 posts

Re: A little trick to spam the spammers (2021)

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There were*

No, there are. I still see masses of businesses signing up for b2b products using contact@ or info@ addresses.

As much as I hate it one company I work with has not just a functional info@ adress, but it is the main adress they interact with everyone.

Just works.

Re: A little trick to spam the spammers (2021)

#222
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I usually search "tempmail service" on some search engine and take a random link.

I use mailinator, but their domains are blocked by many services. Fortunately, they don't check if the provided domain resolves to one of the blocked domains... So I created an MX record on a domain I own that points to a mailinator domain. Works like a charm.

This is brilliant

Re: A little trick to spam the spammers (2021)

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No navigation. Not RESTful.

I saw this comment yesterday and it bugged me that text/plain doesn’t support links. But maybe we could provide links in headers if we popularized the following HTTP standard [1] [2]? HTTP/1.1 200/OK Link: ; rel="home" Link: ; rel="up" Link: ; rel="prev" [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8288#section-3.5 [2]: https://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relatio...

Is there much advantage over just sending HTML with just the tags: “html body head p a” ?

I guess it would be nice for bots to get the set of links in a header.

Re: A little trick to spam the spammers (2021)

#224

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12951917 DonHopkins on Nov 14, 2016 | parent | context | favorite | on: The NHS's 1.2M employees are trapped in a 'reply-a... Back in the days of ARPANET mailing lists, there used to be an "educational" mailing list called "please-remove-me", that was for people who asked an entire mailing list to remove them, instead of removing themselves, or sending email to the administrative…

There's been a solution for this forever. If someone sends an email with most of the words just being "unsubscribe" or "remove me" then at the least you don't send it on. Added points for auto-replying unsubscribe instructions or even just do it. Fairly basic for a mailing list program.

this simple behavior can be applied today to unsubscribe from “noreply@” emails and it’s not done

Re: A little trick to spam the spammers (2021)

#225

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12951917 DonHopkins on Nov 14, 2016 | parent | context | favorite | on: The NHS's 1.2M employees are trapped in a 'reply-a... Back in the days of ARPANET mailing lists, there used to be an "educational" mailing list called "please-remove-me", that was for people who asked an entire mailing list to remove them, instead of removing themselves, or sending email to the administrative…

> Back in the days of ARPANET mailing lists, there used to be an "educational" mailing list called "please-remove-me", that was for people who asked an entire mailing list to remove them, instead of removing themselves, or sending email to the administrative "-request" address.

Pure genius.

Re: A little trick to spam the spammers (2021)

#226
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think Log4shell was about the closest we got to this. It’s still crazy to me you could exploit an unknown machine by leaving a string of text somewhere and waiting for a vulnerable client to process it. I imagine many spammers are running a lot of insecure PHP and Perl scripts to support their operation. That was certainly the case back in ~2006, and I imagine most “new entrant” spammers are not using email but rat…

Blind XSS is a thing. not my fault you haphazardly inserted into an HTML field in some browser at some point in the future. DNS records, facebook statuses, titles of apps on the playstore, Wifi SSIDs, BIO's on obscure forums, names of children, recipe ingredients, your TV's network nick name...anything that can hold the input of a user, that a scraper or content mechanism will eventually naively come across... eventu…

> ...anything that can hold the input of a user, that a scraper or content mechanism will eventually naively come across

Good way to put it, and I'm going to share this.

Re: A little trick to spam the spammers (2021)

#227

The design of this blog is delightfully readable: no popups, no banners, no FOUC as I wait for a beautiful webfont to load.

No navigation. Not RESTful.

Navigation is done by hand, remove spam.txt from the url and you're in the index (a small html page listing other posts).

Re: A little trick to spam the spammers (2021)

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reminds me of leaving “+++” in bbs posts. This the the AT “hangup” command and would often cause the reader’s modem to disconnect from the internet.

Didn't that just put the modem into "command mode"? I thought you needed +++ATH.

You had to pause for a moment after the third +.

Re: A little trick to spam the spammers (2021)

#229
Their main contact e-mail can already be unsubscribed but you can try extra emails (after +) like user+spam@company.com Those often arrive to user's inbox but behave like a different address in their spam database.

And of course, as others suggested, you can also subscribe sales, hiring, website staff, abuse@ and other departments.

Re: A little trick to spam the spammers (2021)

#230

I run marketing email databases. This is cute, but it doesn't actually do anything in most systems - either the employees all already get the marketing emails or there is a system-wide rule to suppress against the email domain. If you actually want to (potentially) break something, try submitting some obscure characters or malformed html into some fields. Blank spaces in emails can particularly be a nuisance. And if…

What they should do is put in a non existing email eg: foobar323992382@gmail.com . These are great since email senders get hit hard with bounces which kill your send rates.

You really had to go and put my email address out there didn’t you? At least pick a nonexistent one….sheesh
Post reply on HN