The sixth video in the series is really a work of art: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIyruYQ-N4Q&list=PLaNzoFtkQ7... I've thought a lot about arguments and premises and values and conclusions and how it connects with frustration and humiliation and shame, and really wasn't expecting all those subjects to come in in a video about hexaflexagons.
Hexaflexagons [video] (2012)
31–40 of 61 posts
Re: Hexaflexagons [video] (2012)
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
TikTok has a lot of creative content on flexagons: https://www.tiktok.com/tag/flexagon It’s also not intended for long-form content, which is fine. If someone is super interested in the topic, related math, etc — easy to find information elsewhere using search engine and the short videos are much more likely to get someone’s attention.
Oh sure, the internet has a lot more related info readily available than was ever possible by using microfiche. And my phone can keep track of more more phone numbers than I was ever able to memorize. But, I know far fewer numbers now than I did as a kid, and my son will know far less than I did about flexagons. One reason may be because he knows it is readily available, he won't learn it himself. And one reason is b…
There is just too much to keep in a human brain. So, don’t, or, try and make an effort to separate the wheat from the chaff and know where it’s ok to give some up. No, your kids will probably not know as much about an origami trick, but they will know more about fusion or quantum computing or nanobots than you ever will. That doesn’t make them disadvantaged or you better. They might know more about Octaflexagons than you.
I’m sure my grand father that worked in a foundry making cast iron pipe would be horrified to discover I don’t know a lot about that process, but I could easily look up more than he ever knew.
So, this largely seems like a “kids these days” type of rant.
Re: Hexaflexagons [video] (2012)
#33I love to recommend ViHart’s “Suspend your Disbelief” video: https://youtu.be/deg1wmYjwtk It takes a special place in my heart for being able to break apart and explain the effects of media and belief - especially of media referenced within media.
Re: Hexaflexagons [video] (2012)
#34Re: Hexaflexagons [video] (2012)
#35I love to recommend ViHart’s “Suspend your Disbelief” video: https://youtu.be/deg1wmYjwtk It takes a special place in my heart for being able to break apart and explain the effects of media and belief - especially of media referenced within media.
Genius.
Re: Hexaflexagons [video] (2012)
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
TikTok has a lot of creative content on flexagons: https://www.tiktok.com/tag/flexagon It’s also not intended for long-form content, which is fine. If someone is super interested in the topic, related math, etc — easy to find information elsewhere using search engine and the short videos are much more likely to get someone’s attention.
Oh sure, the internet has a lot more related info readily available than was ever possible by using microfiche. And my phone can keep track of more more phone numbers than I was ever able to memorize. But, I know far fewer numbers now than I did as a kid, and my son will know far less than I did about flexagons. One reason may be because he knows it is readily available, he won't learn it himself. And one reason is b…
I read this to the backdrop of the movie "Idiocracy" playing in my mind. Especially the "porn, fast-food, caffeine" (aka Starbucks in the movie :P)
Re: Hexaflexagons [video] (2012)
#37I saw a reference to Martin Gardner's article when I was in, maybe, 9th grade. So I went to the main branch of the NY public library ("reading between the lions") and looked up the article on microfiche. It was fascinating and fun - from how to make a row of equilateral triangles with nothing more than a ruler, pen and paper. Many, many hours were spent on the various flexagon derivatives. Years later, I made a JS pa…
The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise.
Re: Hexaflexagons [video] (2012)
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh sure, the internet has a lot more related info readily available than was ever possible by using microfiche. And my phone can keep track of more more phone numbers than I was ever able to memorize. But, I know far fewer numbers now than I did as a kid, and my son will know far less than I did about flexagons. One reason may be because he knows it is readily available, he won't learn it himself. And one reason is b…
A few random thoughts on this. 1. The main issue I see is that smartphones are primarily devices for consumption (vs creation). The creation you can do easily are well established tools (digital writing, photography and videography). Where TikTok and Insta have succeeded is simple editing tools for the latter two (+ sharing and social algos etc). 2. To the action we as technologist need to take, is to build tools for…
Seeing smartphone software as the complete editing tool - in the mold of desktop software - isn't that interesting, creatively speaking. It's very precise to use software in that way, to emulate professional workflows from generations ago and create all sorts of shortcuts and configurations. But it only affects decision-making workflows in a limited sense, because what the precision mostly does is pull you down the road towards polishing your output more and more, making smaller and smaller edits with more and more layers. Why are you polishing it? If you exit the software and change mediums, you can actually accomplish more with less, because then you can just accept the limitations and finish. Software is often at its best with mixed media approaches where it supplements a few tasks with a light layer of edits, a data processing step, or a preliminary design iteration. But there are many traditional techniques and technologies that don't need it, or amount to "we strap some AI onto it to turn an imprecise machine into a precise one".
The consumption-device viewpoint of the phone is an invention of the software industry. The reality is that people are doing a lot of productive things just by turning the phone into a portable scanner or audio recorder. It's already the fastest way to grab references for most media. If you set up a Bluetooth keyboard and a stand, the small screen works fine for typing up run-once code to solve immediate problems. The things blocking creativity are a combination of the software ecosystem being unready to deprofessionalize itself and exit the industrialized "app" model(and it is unready - we have a lot of maturation to do still to automate programmers out of their jobs), and the atmosphere of social media to engage in rat races for likes and follows, which is caused through incoherent models of assigning credit and blame, poor mechanisms of identity management, etc.
Re: Hexaflexagons [video] (2012)
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
TikTok has a lot of creative content on flexagons: https://www.tiktok.com/tag/flexagon It’s also not intended for long-form content, which is fine. If someone is super interested in the topic, related math, etc — easy to find information elsewhere using search engine and the short videos are much more likely to get someone’s attention.
Oh sure, the internet has a lot more related info readily available than was ever possible by using microfiche. And my phone can keep track of more more phone numbers than I was ever able to memorize. But, I know far fewer numbers now than I did as a kid, and my son will know far less than I did about flexagons. One reason may be because he knows it is readily available, he won't learn it himself. And one reason is b…
Most kids didn't randomly look up microfiche articles in libraries in your generation, even if some did. Most kids in this generation wont go deep with learning on the internet. Some 15 year olds find MIT open course ware and go wild. Its just the way of the world.
To leave off with a quote
"The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise." -- Socrates (allegedly)