Live data from Hacker News

Review our startup: FlowMingle - Online Dating for the Social Internet

flowmingle.com

31–40 of 55 posts

Re: Review our startup: FlowMingle - Online Dating for the Social Internet

#31
post #23
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What if someone's name is actually Demo?

Well, then I suppose we will be adding another unfortunate event to his/her life... and with Demo as a name, even FlowMingle couldn't help much ;)

According to a quick search, "69 People found that match Demo in the state of California." I noticed 1 or 2 with the name "Demos", but other than that.....

Perhaps, since sign-up as "Demo" is special functionality anyways, you could ask the user to confirm that they're "Demoing" the account or if their name actually IS "Demo".

Albeit, 69/36.5m < 0.0002% of the population so you could probably get away with letting the user know that they're been automatically "Demo'd" and only fix it if you have to.

Re: Review our startup: FlowMingle - Online Dating for the Social Internet

#32
post #29

From what I saw, the site looks decent. The design is pretty good, the registration wasn't painful. I didn't really get to see much. My main thought: I have to do way too much work before I can see the benefits to using your site. I can't see pictures of people or anything. I'm not going to fill out all of this information, upload pictures, etc with no idea if there are any hot chicks on there. Try and show people th…

I agree with this point. I'm not joining a dating site without being able to see the chicks.

Simple as that.

Re: Review our startup: FlowMingle - Online Dating for the Social Internet

#33
post #32
post #29

From what I saw, the site looks decent. The design is pretty good, the registration wasn't painful. I didn't really get to see much. My main thought: I have to do way too much work before I can see the benefits to using your site. I can't see pictures of people or anything. I'm not going to fill out all of this information, upload pictures, etc with no idea if there are any hot chicks on there. Try and show people th…

I agree with this point. I'm not joining a dating site without being able to see the chicks. Simple as that.

[deleted]

Re: Review our startup: FlowMingle - Online Dating for the Social Internet

#35
Interesting concept. I have a suggestion about the presentation: Right now there are very few pictures of people on the website. There's some tiny ones on the front page (the b&w one doesn't count), and then even tinier ones in the screenshots on the tour. But mostly what I'm looking at are pictures of web pages.

If I go to a dating site, I'm looking for people. As it is, I look at your site and get the sense that it's all about web pages rather than about people. (I'd imagine this might be especially offputting to women.)

I know you don't have any users to show off now, but I'm sure you could find some suitable stock photos.

Re: Review our startup: FlowMingle - Online Dating for the Social Internet

#37
post #11

the name is incredibly unappealing.

Mingle good, flow bad.

I actually think "flomingle" would be better. It de-emphasises the less pleasant connotations of "flow" while getting closer to the "flamingo" connotation.

"Flamingle" on the other hand would only be good if it were a gay dating site.

Re: Review our startup: FlowMingle - Online Dating for the Social Internet

#40
First, Good luck. There needs to be a winner in this area & I don't know of any candidates. I kind of feel that the secret sauce is something that needs to be discovered not invented. These are my thoughts (no particular order).

1. Most players are paid services. I think there is a good chance that whatever winner emerges will be a free service or at least free for 90% + of active users. The service is essentially better if it is free (network effects but more then that: You can take it lightly if it's free. It's serious business if it's paid) so any paid service would be in constant danger of a free clone emerging.

2. Let non-singles get involved. Encourage meddling. Set other people up. Introduce, create polls on who should be together. I dunno, something in that area. Maybe think along the lines of 14 yr olds instead of 30 somethings using a professional dating service. The former have fun. The latter do not.

3. Let people approach this from an angle. Just like in real life. Meeting in singles bars, via introductions, pickups etc. is only one way. Most people prefer meeting someone at work, meditation workshops or University. Dunno how you'de do that online, but it would be interesting if you could piggyback on ways people interact with each other online already. Facebook/Myspace is an obvious path. But maybe Digg, blogs, wiki editing, amazon reviews or even HN might provide a thread to pull on.

4. Be un-sleazy & you have an immediate edge (design looks right for this). That feeling that half the users are fake, that they inflate women or men's numbers... That's will be on users minds (good reasons too). All that damage needs to be mended.

5. Try to build in dynamism. However this is gonna work, I doubt anyone can predict the whole picture. Find some ways to let users find ways of dating online rather then handing them a system.

6. Let the kids show you how to do it. Maybe you should try & focus on getting dates for 14 yr olds. They might pave some sort of a path.

7. Maybe focus on the non market. There's a tendency to focus on those people that are having trouble. They're very goal oriented. There is a problem that they're going to fix. So many services are tailored around filling that whole. But there it might be easier to get earlier successes with those that will probably get a date this month anyway. You just fill the 'how'.

Post reply on HN